Some people think watching TV is bad for children, while others think that watching TV has more beneficial effects on children. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
Whether watching television brings good or bad impacts upon kids has been a controversial issue. Both views have their advantages and disadvantages which will be elaborated below.
On the one hand, there are various benefits that children can receive from watching TV programmes including education, entertainment, and social values. The first merit from this is that TV is a valuable source of information for children. Many TV channels are functioned as knowledge providers, which specialize in supplying their audience with reliable and up-to-the-minute data about a wide range of subjects. Therefore, it helps young to attain know-how and broadens their knowledge. In addition, it is common that TV often covers entertaining contents, which are designed for young users. Songs, games, dances are popular programs that are broadcast especially for children. Finally, by watching inspiring stories about inprivileged individuals such as the homeless, poor, and disable, on TV, children would feel sympathy for those people and lucky about themselves, thereby having a sense of fullfilment. Thus, it is obvious that children can be beneficial while watching TV.
On the other hand, watching TV programs marks a negative impact on children in several dimensions. First, it exerts a burden on health of young individuals. While excessive exposure to TV screens is the main culprit of many eye-related issues, sedentary lifestyle could be attibutable to addiction to TV channels. Another negative affect from watching television stem from the loose control of the adult. In this case, if there is lack of supervision from parental roles, children are likely to watch programs that are involved in toxic or taboo graphic. These contents may encourage antisocial behaviors or unlawful acts of children. In the circumstances, if parents neglect their responsibility to look after their children, kids can encounter dire consequences.
In sum, even though young people may be effected by wrongdoings appeard on TV, the insutrument is trustful ssource in terms of science, society and recreatiion values. I believe it is better for children watch TV under the watch of their parents or guardians.
- Some people think that certain old buildings are more worth preserving than the other ones Which types of old buildings should be preserved Do you think that the advantages of preserving these old buildings outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Companies use major sporting events to promote their products Some people think it has a negative effect on sport in general To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Young people learn good behavior more from movies and books than real life experiences To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- people move to different places several times during their life Causes Is this a negative or positive development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 331, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...iction to TV channels. Another negative affect from watching television stem from the loose...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1860.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48672566372 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02299296038 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601769911504 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.9567906697 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8947368421 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8421052632 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42105263158 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364131067807 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113245865638 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862256833558 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216053678194 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705606168808 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.