Pop stars earn much more than classical music performers. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Music is an intergral part of human's recreational activities. Some people believe that popstars should receive more income than classical music players why others think otherwise. There are both mertis and drawbacks behind the movement.
There are several rationales imply the decent income of pop artists. First, their music is more popular than their counterparts who play classical music. This stems from the nature of pop music, which tends to have catchy melody with the lyrics often refering to comtemporary issue. These factors play an important role in attracting the majority of their audience who are young and curious to new trend. Secondly, pop singers are more likely to sacrify their privacy. It is common that personal information of pop star become the hot topic of disscussion among the public. People, in general, are eager to explore more about the ones that they admire, it is therefore beneficial for media to capitalise on the instinct by broadcasting ways of life of famous pop stars. Thus, pop music celebrities earn large sum of money in exchange for their sacrifices.
On the other hand, artists playing classical music should be rewards better in terms of finance and attention of the general audience. The first point in support of this view is that music artists have to equally invest their time and energy regardless of the music they play. Therefore, performers of clasical music or modern one should be paid similiar amount of income or attention. An additional support of this view is that in addition to artistic content, classical music also contains culteral and heritige values. This is because classical songs or music are created many years ago, these masterpieces therefore carry history and tradition of people's ancesters with them. If artists do not play the music, valuable heritage and custom may be forgotten. That is why old-fashioned music players should be credited and paid accordingly.
In sum, pop music performers provide spectators with trendy music and stand a higher risk of losing their private life. I believe that fame and money would justify their losses.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-21 | ngthanh1220@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | HarshSharma9 | 67 | view |
| 2022-10-16 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-06-30 | hungdung2507 | 84 | view |
| 2021-12-12 | Hoàng Tiến Đạt | 89 | view |
- Directors of large organizations earn much higher salaries than ordinary employees do Some people think it is necessary but others hold that it is unfair Discuss both views and give your own opinions 84
- Companies use major sporting events to promote their products Some people think it has a negative effect on sport in general To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages 67
- It is often argued that it is difficult to get children to read Why do you think this is What measures could be taken to encourage children to read more Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 89
- Environmental damage is a problem in most countries What factors damage the environment and who should take responsibility 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16569767442 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56996309631 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587209302326 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6323286183 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.85 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268700559854 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769933969999 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054457452998 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163789719149 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482987929377 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.