Companies use major sporting events to promote their products. Some people think it has a negative effect on sport in general. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It has become increasly common that firms utilize popular sporting events to advertise their offerings. Some persons believe that this trend has negative impacts on the development of sports. I somewhat disagree with this view as the involvement of companies in sports generally brings more good than harm to sports.
The first reason why I advocate to the companies' support of sports is that it would stimulates the growth of local economy. This is because companies often invest in holding the events in exchange for their products' appearance on live TV programs, news, or social media. Given the sponsorship from the businesses, organizers of the events can allocate more resources in captivating visuals, contents, which help attract more audience. If the events succeed in appealing more people to the areas where the events are held, local businesses will be tremendously benefited.
Another explanation for my objection to the belief that interference of companies impair sports development is that althletes can be beneficial from the movement. Famous professional athletes often have the contract with sponsors to endorse their products. This collaboration provides the professionals with a plethora of merits including money, nutritional supply, and so forth, which allow the athletes to raise their living standards, and focus on their professional career, thereby being able to enhance their performance.
Admittedly, there are some companies may over-abuse sporting events to advertise low-quality products. By doing so, these businesses not only damage the reputation of the sporting occasions but their goods may have detrimental impacts on the buyers' health.
In sum, I somewhat oppose the argument that promotion of products in sporting events generally has a negative affect on sports. The investment of the companies acts as a stimulus for the posperity of the local community and success of athletes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-26 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-26 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-26 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-26 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-26 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
- Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people find advertisements amusing or annoying and they are not influenced by this when they shop To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In education and employment some people work harder than others Why do some people work harder Is it always a good thing to work hard 89
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
- Some people think watching TV is bad for children while others think that watching TV has more beneficial effects on children Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'stimulate'
Suggestion: stimulate
...nies support of sports is that it would stimulates the growth of local economy. This is be...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 243, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'buyers'' or 'buyer's'?
Suggestion: buyers'; buyer's
...ods may have detrimental impacts on the buyers health. In sum, I somewhat oppose t...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 111, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...porting events generally has a negative affect on sports. The investment of the companies...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1641.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54391891892 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90958020299 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574324324324 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7304475259 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.214285714 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.64285714286 7.06120827912 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30877034789 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105556236572 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653455184905 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177143561203 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495748287285 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.