Many people argued that rising in the minimum age of eligibility for drivers will increase road safety. While this idea might help reduce the number of road accidents, I could maintain that imposing stricter punishments for traffic rule violations would be the most feasible solution.
On the one hand, this approach might reduce traffic collisions, improving road safety. To be more precise, traffic incidents decrease as commuters get older since they are more mature and responsible when they enter a traffic. Additionally, this approach discourages immature children from reckless driving because they are unaware of the consequences of their behavior. Because there are fewer traffic accidents in both of these scenarios, other commuters will be in a safer environment.
However, raising the licensing age cap will only address a small portion of these intricate road safety enhancements. In fact, many young people today continue to drive without a license, which makes traffic accidents worse. Therefore, imposing harsher penalties that deter drivers from committing traffic-related infractions would be the most effective option. For instance, violators of the speed limit or those who consume alcohol while driving ought to face severe financial penalties or the suspension of their driver's license. As a result, more motorists will abide by the law when they are in traffic, helping to increase road safety.
In conclusion, while raising the minimum legal age for driving can help to enhance road safety by preventing young people from commuting, imposing considerably tougher penalties on those who break the law would be the optimum approach. Governments, in my opinion, must also take quick action to address the enduring problems of traffic accidents and other associated issues.
- The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicine Government funding should reflect this To what extend do you agree or disagree 67
- The following chart shows the results of a British survey taken in 2009 related to Housing preferences of UK people 78
- The chart below shows the amount of time that 10 to 15 year olds spending chatting on the Internet and playing on games consoles on an average school day in the UK 67
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 78
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn news However others believe that they can learn news better than through other media Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 216, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'traffic'.
Suggestion: traffic
... mature and responsible when they enter a traffic. Additionally, this approach discourage...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 389, Rule ID: FEWER_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'less traffic'?
Suggestion: less traffic
...es of their behavior. Because there are fewer traffic accidents in both of these scenarios, o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51086956522 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77865009408 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579710144928 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1719870025 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156031446255 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618650317445 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712407217565 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112493165226 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554624226156 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.