In the modern world, it is possible to shop, work and communicate online and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is this a positive or negative development?
People this day are able to do things on the internet and do not need to meet each other in the real world due to the development of technology. From my perspective, this upgrade brings to our life two sides that can not be ignored.
On the one hand, online life provides individuals with various benefits. People can do online shopping when they are busy with their business, students will not miss their lessons even though they are sick because they can attend the online class, or employees who are working far from home still can be in contact with their families. Therefore, individuals now can approach jobs, studies, or entertainment with only private device requirements. Take the online class as an example, in 2021, covid-19 pandemic spread globally preventing people to get out of their homes. At that time, pupils from all over the world can not only take part in their classes but also do the school test when they are at home.
On the other hand, people who have online life can be harmed by some factors. When they are shopping, working, or communicating with others on the internet, it is hard to make sure that their online fellow is good or bad. The Internet is a large open world so the user might get cheated if they are neglected. For example, online crime can make a fake profile to take all user private data then the victim has to pay a refund to get their documents back.
All things considered, having the ability to do things online is convenient and time-saving. Besides, people who always use the internet must pay attention and be alert to everything they do to protect themselves from negative effects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-26 | minhphambinh1234 | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-02 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 67 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | cinderel | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-12 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-01 | lehung | 67 | view |
- Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones for communication has a negative effect on young people s reading and writing skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work rather than on university education To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements and this sets a bad example to young people To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 80
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate online and live without any face to face contact with others Is this a positive or negative development 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, still, then, therefore, as to, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70833333333 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47347034661 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559027777778 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6503537554 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.307692308 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147815623391 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558580777262 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366799942829 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0899853855797 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292521075231 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, still, then, therefore, as to, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70833333333 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47347034661 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559027777778 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6503537554 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.307692308 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147815623391 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558580777262 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366799942829 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0899853855797 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292521075231 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.