Some people fail in school but end up being successful in life. why do you think that is the case? What is the most important thing to succeed?
It is often argued that many individuals who were unable to perform well in their schools turned out to be great achievers in their life. This essay will explain the reasons for this phenomenon and the key factors to achieving success in life.
There is only convincing reason to illustrate this above phenomenon that they are proactive in empirical activities and not constrained by limitations in education. To begin with, there is an inaccurate recognition of poor academic scores that they will not be able to succeed in life. In fact, a number of situations are proven in the opposite way. Several individuals who have higher scores in universities must memorize lots of theoretical statements and mostly spend time on their assignments. This perhaps could help them to get a high score which occasionally caused less encouragement for them in extra-curriculum activities that debase their importance in the eyes of employers as the criteria needed for their’s evaluation is experiences without theory in the book. Nevertheless, poor-mark individuals have different tendencies. Although several famous successful people such as the giants of Apple, Microsft, and Facebook, for example, are dropouts as they do not have the ability to absorb the conventional methods of education, they still make a colossal attainment in their career path. As a consequence, diligent students only elucidate that they are extremely good at theory, but the lack of empirical experiences can be represented by them.
It is obviously true that tremendous success is derived from not only determination, and diligence but also training the skills. Indeed, the above multinational organization’s giant success is dependent on certain skills. To illustrate, they always put themselves in challenges, upgrade themselves through practical evidence to assimilate considerable skills, and hone it constantly which assists them to handle problems immediately. In these cases, success is depicted by skills, not preeminent academic qualifications.
In conclusion, the key reason behind the success stories of people who were poor school performers is because of specific limitations in the school curriculum, and in this case, the most significant factor behind success is skills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-07 | thaokim2003 | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-15 | m_sepahi@ymail.com | 56 | view |
| 2022-01-15 | Revivo Tulaseket | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-15 | Lastinfortune | 89 | view |
| 2017-11-30 | mrymhmt | 98 | view |
- Some countries achieve international sports by building specialised facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Do you think this is positive or negative development Discuss both views and give your opinio 61
- The charts below show the class size of four states of Australia 73
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree You should write at lea 89
- Some people say that young people should be encouraged to leave home when they become adults while others claim it is better if they remain with their family Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The internet has transformed the way information is shared and consumed but it has also created problems that did not exist before What are the most serious problems associated with the internet and what solutions can you suggest 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 713, Rule ID: YOUR_S[1]
Message: Did you mean 'their' or 'theirs'?
Suggestion: their; theirs
...of employers as the criteria needed for their’s evaluation is experiences without theor...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, so, still, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1917.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52449567723 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17715729813 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576368876081 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.0039056083 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.8 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1333333333 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149202856626 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456595393471 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045687674079 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100063171443 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468971369857 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 713, Rule ID: YOUR_S[1]
Message: Did you mean 'their' or 'theirs'?
Suggestion: their; theirs
...of employers as the criteria needed for their’s evaluation is experiences without theor...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, so, still, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1917.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52449567723 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17715729813 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576368876081 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.0039056083 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.8 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1333333333 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149202856626 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456595393471 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045687674079 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100063171443 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468971369857 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.