Many people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries, shops, and public transport. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
It is a common belief that a regulation should be made to prohibit people from using cell phones in communal locations such as libraries, shops, and public transport. From my perspective, I strongly agree with this point of view.
In my opinion, using smartphones in public areas is inconsequential because it disturbs people from taking attention to their work. For instance, in libraries, where people have the predisposition to study and read materials, they will not feel pleased when some notifications from others’ phones disrupt their work. For this reason, people are restricted to perform as they expected and also descend their quality of work, which leads to unsatisfactory consequences. Moreover, using smartphones not only disturbs people around us but also adversely impacts our work performance and requires extra time to accomplish.
Another reason why using mobile phones in communal locations is detrimental is that it causes a decline in the interaction between people. When people pay attention to their phones, they will not have the tendency to focus on their conservation with other people. This impolite action makes the one we talk to feel they are disrespected and exacerbates the network between people and society. Secondly, people easily take less care of others’ feelings. In the long run, it results in making people more emotionless. With this long-term effect, the future generation will be easily less sociable, dynamic, and more aggravated, they will be self-isolated from the community.
In conclusion, phone usage in public areas adversely affects surrounding people. Therefore, I strongly believe that it is safer when we prohibit phones in those places.
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now one big traffic jam How true do you think this statement is What measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars 73
- Many people today would argue that cinemas are becoming irrelevant due to new streaming services To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Many people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries shops and public transport To what extent do you agree with this statement 61
- Today s fresh food like vegetables or fruits travels thousands of miles from the rural areas or farms before it reaches customers in cities or urban areas Why is this Is this a positive or negative trend 89
- Young people who commit crimes should be treated the same as adults by the authorities To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your knowledge or experience 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43773584906 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94937467351 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569811320755 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4722126897 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.928571429 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205263294955 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730229615414 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512548161496 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140266181648 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692751228619 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43773584906 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94937467351 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569811320755 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4722126897 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.928571429 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205263294955 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730229615414 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512548161496 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140266181648 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692751228619 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.