Organized tour to remote areas and community is increasingly popular. Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and the environ- ment?
Tourism nowadays is more and more popular and developed. Especially in some remote and exotic destinations on the earth. Even though this has several benefits for the local community, I believe that all of its disadvantages will bring more toll than the benefits.
Admittedly, local people will have enormous benefits from the growing up of the tourism industry. The more tourists, the more service and food they need. So that people can earn a huge of money, this can change their life by building restaurants, hotels, or visiting destinations. For instance, Sapa was a poor remote city with rudimentary mountains but after the country started developing, people realized its future potential, then they built a lot of buildings like hotels, cafes, and homestays. At the present, Sapa is one of the most expensive places to live.
On the other hand, the increasing tourism also brings some disadvantages for not only the environment but also the people. In detail, a large number of forest areas have to be cut down to build hotels and restaurants which cause landslides. Moreover, because of the increasing of visitors, the percentage of smoke reduced by vehicles will raise day by day. Those will play a big role in destroying the environment. Besides that, some people instead of becoming richer, they may become poor by losing houses and lands. Since some lands are in the harvested area, the government will pay some money for them however, it may not be enough for their new house so they lose everything.
To conclude, besides some of the benefits, I believe that its back draws have a huge impact not only on people but also on the environment
- Big salary is more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people think that robots are very important to human s future development Others think that they are dangerous and have negative effects on society Discuss both opinions and give your personal view 80
- The table and chart below show the time spent at leisure and household activities in Britain Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people think that young people should follow the traditions of the society Others think young people are free to behave as individuals Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ronment but also the people. In detail, a large number of forest areas have to be cut down to bui...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 22, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ose everything. To conclude, besides some of the benefits, I believe that its back draws...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1385.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96415770609 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69204022766 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598566308244 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6109104742 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3333333333 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16582903912 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489289252253 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0326523240017 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094616797831 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0161215641451 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.