Write about the following topic:
Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.
Write at least 250 words.
Smoking has always been a controversial topic for generations. Due to the fact that smoking not only causes a bad effects on smokers, but also on those who inhale the smoke from cigarette. So, the government should enact some policies in order to prohibit smoking in public areas.
On the one hand, the smoke from cigarettes or tobacco often weakens the respiratory system. In particular, children whose parents smoke near them may become ashman at a young age if their parents smoke nearby. Besides, if there are too many people consuming cigarettes in the same places, it will cause some problems for the environment. In Vietnam, for instance, elders and adults always go to a café in the morning to smoke and talk. Because of the large number of tobacco-smoking people like that, air pollution has become a serious problem at the current stage of Vietnam. So that is the reason why the government should ban smoking in public.
On the other hand, the government or local authorities should build more smoking areas in general or have some punishments for smokers addicted to tobacco and cigarettes. For instance, on the first or second offense, they just have to pay for the police. As a result of breaking the rules, they will have to stay in jail. That can make them more aware of smoking's seriousness.
In conclusion, smoking always has a negative impact on our lives and on others. So, I think it should be banned in public places to protect our mental health and the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-27 | TLan168 | 61 | view |
| 2023-03-27 | TLan168 | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-14 | Prakreeti | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-18 | deolkuljeet1991 | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-18 | deolkuljeet1991 | 67 | view |
- The bar chart illustrates the percentage of adults who were overweight or obese between 1965 to 2015 while the pie chart demonstrates the part of adults who were overweight obese severely obese and healthy or underweight in 2015 73
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK university in 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country What are the reasons Solutions to change negative attitudes 73
- Task 1 The table below gives information about values of the exports of Kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012 Unit NZ 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, may, second, so, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in general, in particular, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1241.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82879377432 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6522126915 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587548638132 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2014244689 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.7333333333 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273708617471 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964534180137 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063429363218 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171934739282 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062022400892 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, may, second, so, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in general, in particular, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1241.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82879377432 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6522126915 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587548638132 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2014244689 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.7333333333 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273708617471 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964534180137 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063429363218 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171934739282 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062022400892 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.