Some people think that it is a waste of money for countries to host big sporting events like the world cup, and that the money would be better spent on other things. However, others think that hosting large sporting events has a clear, positive impact on a country. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is disputed that whether money is squanderred to hold huge sport competitions, or the events have positive implications on the host nation. This essay will elaborate on both sides of the argument, and explain why the gains would overshadow the disadvantages.
On the one hand, it is beneficial for the country organizing the events in many dimensions. Large sport festivals open up opportunities for nations to build up their national images. The major undertaking being aired to milions of viewers and spectators will foster soft power, facilitating economic, cultural, social cooperations globally. Another advantage of holding international sporting events is that it spurs national sports development. While competing at Olympics and Worldcups are the prime aspiration, winning gold medals would rewards athletes with great sense of enjoyment and fulfillment. In the pursuit of participating in the major sport events as Olympics, athletes have to endlessly practice and enhance their performance which is the precursor of sport development.
On the other hand, there are dark sides of organizing major sport events. The first issue is that the host nation has to bear massive expenditure including new constructions of facilities and infrastructures. Despite the huge allocation of resources in advance, it is uncertain that the authorities are able to reap the benefits from the economic bet. It is not uncommon that the colossal cost of holding such events leaves nations mired down in debt afterwards. Additionally, the influx of foreign visitors may disturb the rhythem of local everyday life. Anomalous beliefs, exotic culture, and unfamiliar lifestyle coming along with outsiders may place the foreigners at odds with local citizens. This acts as a predecessor for unwanted hostility between local and overseas spectators.
In sum, the outcome of spending money on sport events is unclear and the events would disrupt the local ambiance. However, the organizers are given great chance to build up reputation and encourage domestic sports advancement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-05 | Nguyễn Tiến Vũ | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | Nguyễn Tiến Vũ | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | Nguyễn Tiến Vũ | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | linhchihwg | 82 | view |
| 2023-04-01 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
- Leaders and directors in organizations are normally older people Some people think having a younger leader would be better To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Technology has changed the way children spend their free time Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The most important function of music is that it helps people reduce stress To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree Provide relevant examples if necessary 84
- Some people think that certain old buildings are more worth preserving than the other ones Which types of old buildings should be preserved Do you think that the advantages of preserving these old buildings outweigh the disadvantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 541, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'reward'
Suggestion: reward
...e aspiration, winning gold medals would rewards athletes with great sense of enjoyment...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 562, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... gold medals would rewards athletes with great sense of enjoyment and fulfillment...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, while, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55520504732 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03462817257 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599369085174 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0717999129 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.588235294 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6470588235 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52941176471 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245655389518 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744454375201 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724815196491 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154339906967 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441576101599 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.16 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.