The chart below gives information about the age of women in Australia when they give birth to their first child in 1966, 1986 and 2006.
The bar chart compares the age of women in Australia in terms of giving birth to their first child in 1966, 1986 and 2006.
Overall, it can be seen that the top age group came from 20-24, while it witnessed a group of 40+ at the bottom position over the period.
To begin with, in 1996, women aged 20-24 led the way with just over 60%. During the following years, it decreased by around 30%. On the contrary, the 40+ age group started at around 20% in 1986 and increased to 40% in 2006. Finally, in 2016 it dropped to around 33%. Rather, the percentage of women between 30 and 34 grew significantly from above 10% in 1966 to nearly 50% in 2006.
The proportion of women ages 35-39 and 40+ was the same, which rose 30% and under 10% in 2006, respectively. Women ages 19 and under have a downward trend and ending at approximetaly 10%. While women from 25-29 fluctuated, it reached a peak of 40% experiencing a constant rise and fall over the period. Women aged 30-34 also saw a rise in 2006, reaching a peak of 35%. This was followed by a steady decline, ending at around 25% in 2009.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-15 | TLan168 | 67 | view |
| 2022-03-08 | annalabie | 56 | view |
| 2021-11-04 | Nguyễn Ngọc Diệp | view | |
| 2020-12-22 | viviannguyen | 73 | view |
| 2020-09-26 | The Lazy Tiger | 56 | view |
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK university in 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant
- Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 11
- The table below presents the food consumption per person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 61
- The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe compared to the EU average in 2009 and 2010 56
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, so, while, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.36274509804 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34014083574 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573529411765 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7484299088 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.1666666667 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254531536494 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100995354514 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.160412337594 0.0843802449381 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217931713964 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.232612978824 0.0819641961636 284% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.6 13.2329268293 57% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 88.06 61.2550243902 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.71 11.4140731707 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.88 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.