Scientists tell us that some activities are good for health and others are bad. Despite knowing that, millions of people still continue doing unhealthy activities. What are the causes and what are the solutions for this?
It is true that scientists have been putting great efforts in educating citizens about healthy and harmful activities. Being able to distinguish those clearly as they might, many are still reluctant to make changes, culminating in sticking to them as long-lasting habits. In this essay, I will dig into some underlying causes and put forward viable measures to resolve this issue.
There are possibly two potential culprits why some people commit themselves to following the patterns that jeopardise their health. To begin with, it is the financial burden that triggers sedentary lifestyles among residents, especially adult workers. This is because they are held accountable for paying their expenses, thus forcing them to work on night shifts, much as it has detrimental impacts on their well-being. Another factor involves the seemingly bottomless appetite for food and drink, particularly for fast food. Thanks to the invasion of these savoury takeaway meals, many of all ages have been consuming them on an unprecedented scale, admitting that they lack nutritional substance as well as increase the risk of obesity.
Fortunately, some measures can be taken to address this toxic practice. First and foremost, the onus is on government officials to make cutbacks on working time and take pay rise for employees into consideration. For example, it is obligatory for all Japanese enterprises not to allow their employees to work on night shifts, which leads to the average human health of this country reaching top 4 of all nations, according to a 2019 study report from Melbourne University. Additionally, the authorities should respond to the problem of insatiable appetite by requiring fast food stores to list the number of calories on every food label. As a result, not only will consumers be knowledgeable of their daily intake, but they will also have plausible strategies to restrict nutritionally empty foods.
In conclusion, there are indeed various contributors regarding the negligence of residents to scientists’ precautions about unhealthy activities, yet, it can be solved once according actions are implemented imperatively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-03 | thanh1927540 | 89 | view |
| 2023-02-05 | Annavo_1208 | 56 | view |
| 2023-01-15 | Skinny | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-15 | Skinny | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-15 | Skinny | 73 | view |
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views and giv 78
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views and giv 73
- Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 89
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views and giv 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, so, still, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1821.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46846846847 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99836278135 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654654654655 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2210756253 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.071428571 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7857142857 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143613685883 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454160730965 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373531412282 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0790351029769 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022368906965 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.