Team activities can teach more skills for life than those activities which are played alone. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is an opinion that collaborating with others can bring more benefits than performing alone. While self-employment has flexibility, teamwork can give us social relations as well as increase productivity. From my point of view, I totally agree with this statement.
First, people can build relationships. What I mean is that teamwork activities are an opportunity to bond people together while they have to work with others. They have a chance to interact with or make friends with people they have never coordinated with before. For instance, since students first attend a new class at school, teachers frequently organize teamwork activities for students to build relationships. Also, at the workplace, each trip company has a team building program that is included in a plan. As a result, the employees will collaborate with each other. It not only gives the staff more soft skills such as communication, problem-solving, but it also helps the staff members get to know and feel more comfortable at work.
On top of that, performing alone gives individuals flexibility in terms of decision-making. When people work independently, they don't care about time, location or ideas. Individuals who are alone can decide everything on their own at a rapid pace. It is opposed to teamwork, as it is difficult for members to opt for a time or locations to meet. Plus, there are some conflicts that happen when it comes to the ideas. Therefore, a solitary person can easily make decisions and not need to think much.
Overall, I believe that, despite solo work enhancing the work process, teamwork assists us a lot in our social lives, such as learning how to communicate effectively and expanding relationships.
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road cause some problems What are the problems What are the solutions 67
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 61
- The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same job or the same working conditions for life Why is it the case Can you suggest some ways to prepare people to work in the future 61
- Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country in different days 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ew, I totally agree with this statement. First, people can build relationships. W...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 742, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... know and feel more comfortable at work. On top of that, performing alone gives i...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...g. When people work independently, they dont care about time, location or ideas. Ind...
^^^^
Line 5, column 500, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ke decisions and not need to think much. Overall, I believe that, despite solo wo...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, i mean, such as, as a result, as well as, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18637992832 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12938737633 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612903225806 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7391645452 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.357142857 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146413682916 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468605462209 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380582554078 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.073278933725 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443770493936 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.