Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar, which causes many health problems. Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar. Do you agree or disagree?
Sweet food and drinks that are high in sugar are popular among consumers of all ages, However, it should be noted that consuming sugary products could cause deleterious effects on our body, causing health issues like obesity and leading to illnesses such as diabetes. Despite the fact that consuming excessive high-sugar food is detrimental, there are many actions consumers, manufacturers and retailers could take apart from simply raising the prices, which should not be adopted.
Firstly, sugary foods are beneficial to humans. Their pleasant taste can arouse positive emotions and make people feel happy. After a long day of work, a cup of sweet juice could calm the distressed people down and create a relaxing state of mind. If such food or drinks are made expensive to consumers, it may exert financial pressure on them and may lead to workers losing one important way of relaxing.
Secondly, this essay believes that it is up to the consumers to decide how much sugar to take in and parties should be devoted to raising the buyers’ awareness in order to sufficiently decrease their sugar intake. The consumers should prevent themselves from eating too much food that is high in sugar and fat and live a healthy diet, eating sweet foods once in a while as a way of relaxing. Moreover, there are many different kinds of additives which could serve as sweeteners. Food producers should adopt healthier sweeteners which are more friendly to the human body. Last but not least, retailers could take some efforts in indicating the specific amount of sugar each product has and stating the recommended daily intake of sugar on the packages or labels on the store shelves. Stating clearly the numbers could effectively warn the consumers of the possible side-effects and encourage them to eat healthily.
In conclusion, this essay disagrees with the act of making sugary products expensive to consumers, and suggests that there are many actions both buyers and sellers could take to prevent excessive consumption of sugar.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-06 | mrsaidovs@mail.ru | 84 | view |
| 2024-08-22 | ThHuong | 78 | view |
| 2024-08-05 | MEBC Class | view | |
| 2024-02-22 | Elahe13 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-01 | Ahmad_off | 56 | view |
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 56
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films Why could this be Should the government give more financial support to local film industries 89
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 89
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 89
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 413, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... a way of relaxing. Moreover, there are many different kinds of additives which could serve as...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, apart from, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1703.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11411411411 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59953233855 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561561561562 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.2564354441 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6153846154 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380809040924 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118911283737 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073622386968 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223262319877 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0926566822606 0.056905535591 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.