Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Historically, the advent of new leaders has entailed the introduction of a new tenor, and it is therefore debatable whether public demands engender leaders or leaders set public demands. Although there are some examples that reflects the former point of view, I adamantly believe that it is the leaders who creates the demands.
Historically, the advent of new leaders has entailed the introduction of a new tenor, and it is therefore debatable whether public demands engender leaders or leaders set public demands. Although there are some examples that reflects the former point of view, I adamantly believe that it is the leaders who creates the demands.
Granted, leaders are often created by demands, and this can be easily checked through the regime change that happened throughout the history. The change of presidency could epitomize this point of view, in that the public demand is reflected through the presidential election. For example, in case of dealing with Joe Biden, it is natural to conclude that the demand of the US citizens to stop the belligerent policies towards Arabian countries and retrieve the world-leading governance made Donald Trump to relinquish his presidency. As this example and the nature of modern democracy reveals, some leaders are formed by public demands.
Regardless of the previous case, there is a myriad of historical examples where public demands are formed by leaders. The example can be easily found from those of the pre-modern era, where it had been the monarch who set national motto and agenda. For example, it is needless to say that nearly all historical wars put the ruled class in a dire situation, and therefore it was not supported. Therefore it had in general been the leaders who demanded those wars.
In addition to this pre-modern examples, even the leaders of modern democratic society often sets the agenda and creates the concomitant demands. Take global warming as an example. Although there has been some scholars who consistently warned the global warming, it was actually the leaders who disseminated the issue and created the public demand to lag or stop the warming. The politicians, or leaders, of the western country deliberately created the policy to regulate the carbon emission, and these policies helped the public to understand the grave of the global warming. As this example reveals, even in the current democratic society, leaders often creates the public demands.
In brief, I believe that the leaders are more likely to create the demands, for it had in general been the monarch who sets the agenda for the ruled class, and even the presidents of the modern democratic society tend to set the agenda and create the demand accordingly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-29 | batterylow_123 | 58 | view |
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-10-21 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 58 | view |
| 2024-10-04 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 53 | view |
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In deve 66
- The following appeared in a memo to the board of directors of Bargain Brand Cereals One year ago we introduced our first product Bargain Brand breakfast cereal Our very low prices quickly drew many customers away from the top selling cereal companies Alth 66
- Issue 41 The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them not by their contemporaries Task Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the p 66
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of a large highly diversified company Ten years ago our company had two new office buildings constructed as regional headquarters for two regions The buildings were erected by different construction c 63
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep th 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...on, and therefore it was not supported. Therefore it had in general been the leaders who ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in brief, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2001.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 391.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11764705882 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67330600107 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.447570332481 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 630.0 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0905566624 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0625 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4375 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0145250390323 0.243740707755 6% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00621219675783 0.0831039109588 7% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0110927363043 0.0758088955206 15% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0104329465629 0.150359130593 7% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00792196521097 0.0667264976115 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...on, and therefore it was not supported. Therefore it had in general been the leaders who ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in brief, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2001.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 391.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11764705882 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67330600107 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.447570332481 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 630.0 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0905566624 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0625 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4375 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0145250390323 0.243740707755 6% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00621219675783 0.0831039109588 7% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0110927363043 0.0758088955206 15% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0104329465629 0.150359130593 7% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00792196521097 0.0667264976115 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.