Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is believed that globalization has opened up opportunities for several specialists to work in a foreign country as long as they desire to, on the contrary, some people contend that this group of the workforce should be supposed to devote themselves to the nation they experienced the education. Both ideas have their own compelling justification, however, I lean toward the former one, which I assert to be a more beneficial school of thought.
On the one hand, encouraging professionals to work in the country they pursued education is a method to prevent the brain drain phenomenon. It will be meaningless if universities or colleges are continuously built prompted by the government but students opt not to apply the taught knowledge to the present country. Additionally, this may supplement the highly specialized labor sources for the country, especially those in the third world, which may also be conducive to a thriving economy in the long run. For example, marketing was considered strange to Vietnamese citizens in the past, but the current appearance of a plethora of marketers has made this field more popular in this Southeast Asian developing territory.
On the other hand, allowing those individuals to work in a foreign land can result in some major negative points. Firstly, it will meet the individual fundamental demands in working, hence, creating freedom and comfort. This is due to the fact that working plans differ from person to person and people should be given a chance to make the decisions of their life regardless of occupation. Moreover, after a period of adopting knowledge of the second nation in the field, they will probably return to the homeland to spend the rest of their working age. They may use brand-new methods to make a development to the backlog situations, which will do the economy of their native country a service. For instance, Korea sent loads of staff in the art and music industries to the US to have special training in the 1990s, consequently, enabling KPOP and Hallyu waves to thrive and dominate Asian entertainment in the next century.
All in all, both option have their own advantages on the individual or national level. Nevertheless, giving professionals the freedom to choose where to devote themselves should be prioritized thanks to the aforementioned huge benefits that it may bring about.
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 84
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the result of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 78
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, third, for example, for instance, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1977.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10852713178 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9783946042 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573643410853 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.6734258988 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.214285714 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6428571429 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1428571429 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299498465633 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896904795143 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788621935524 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178551677418 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689024803694 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, third, for example, for instance, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1977.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10852713178 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9783946042 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573643410853 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.6734258988 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.214285714 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6428571429 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1428571429 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299498465633 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896904795143 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788621935524 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178551677418 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689024803694 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.