Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes?
A significant proportion of individuals hold the belief that foreign tourism exerts adverse impacts on their nation. Various factors contribute to this negative perception of tourism. This essay will elucidate the underlying reasons for such sentiments and propose viable strategies to mitigate these concerns.
One primary reason is associated with international tourists, who can inadvertently introduce hazardous diseases, including respiratory ailments. For instance, the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2018 demonstrated the potential of international travelers to transmit illnesses to local populations, resulting in widespread global affliction. Additionally, tourists often face criticism for their contribution to environmental degradation. Indigenous communities observe tourists recklessly discarding litter in their surroundings, consequently escalating waste accumulation and environmental pollution. Consequently, this not only affects the natural ecosystem but also leads to issues like skin diseases and disruption of daily lives due to the repugnant stench emanating from the litter.
Addressing this multifaceted issue requires a range of plausible solutions. Firstly, authorities ought to invest in advanced medical screening equipment at international airports, coupled with a dedicated medical team to proactively prevent the spread of diseases into the host country. Secondly, governments should initiate awareness campaigns or display banners that emphasize the prohibition of littering. This approach can effectively enhance tourists' consciousness regarding their environmental responsibilities. Furthermore, establishing an extensive network of strategically placed trash bins can facilitate proper waste disposal and discourage irresponsible littering habits.
In conclusion, a convergence of factors contributes to the apprehensions surrounding foreign tourism, but there exist pragmatic approaches to mitigate these concerns. By implementing the proposed measures, the negative impacts of international tourism can be significantly ameliorated, leading to a more harmonious coexistence between tourists and host communities.
- schools should focus more on teaching students how to succeed in the world of work and less on how to succeed academically To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country What are the reasons Solutions to change negative attitudes 89
- Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The Graph Below Shows Changes In The Share Of Vehicle Registrations Of The Three Most Common Types Of Commercial Vehicles In The US Between 1970 And 2010 Summarise The Information By Selecting And Reporting The Main Features And Make Comparisons 89
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country What are the reasons Solutions to change negative attitudes 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1889.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.74642857143 5.12529762239 132% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.49509678416 2.80592935109 125% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.710714285714 0.561755894193 127% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.1 1.60771543086 131% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4465221737 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.933333333 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147334873519 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467185474708 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358581612134 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0917667399003 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039987222053 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 10.91 50.2224549098 22% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 21.87 12.4159519038 176% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 12.59 8.58950901804 147% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 78.4519038076 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1889.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.74642857143 5.12529762239 132% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.49509678416 2.80592935109 125% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.710714285714 0.561755894193 127% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.1 1.60771543086 131% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4465221737 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.933333333 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147334873519 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467185474708 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358581612134 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0917667399003 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039987222053 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 10.91 50.2224549098 22% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 21.87 12.4159519038 176% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 12.59 8.58950901804 147% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 78.4519038076 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.