As computers translate quickly and accurately, learning foreign languages is a waste of time? To what extent do you agree or disagree.
The advanced digital innovations make modern society capable of translating effortlessly and precisely, considering that discovering foreign language becomes unnecessary. Personally, I opine the same perspective for reasonable points which I will elaborate in the following paragraph.
Conversely, this conveys some positives that to have a new experience of absorbing language can engage individuals in a meaningful conversation. This supports them to adapt with one’s diction and dialect to be well-communicated through different cultural literacy. Bilinguals’ learners, researched by Cambridge University Press, may construct updated brain network to strengthen the cognitive skills. Moreover, along with restricted internet connectivity and electricity, machine translators also render it tricky to decode statements in word index. The specified objectives (academic and journalistic writing) can be served by human intelligent excelling terminology and lexicology in various editing and proofreading.
First of all, it is obvious that within the development of advanced technologies, understanding the new languages needs a longer time. Most of students in the developing countries have been frustrated at learning international language which requires vocabularies, grammar even pronunciation to be focused on. Proved by The Korea Times, all Korean students face a great failure to be proficient at mastering English. Furthermore, the culture diversity of employees in business environment poses a significant challenge for human linguistic capacity. Based on AI Frontier, over 50% European companies deal with limitations in foreign trade due to language barrier. It can creates substantial gaps among workers and employers in which, this leads to ineffective communication, thereby ensuing poor business development.
To conclude, it seems to me that comprehensive study of new languages emerges some potential drawbacks including the long-term learning process and the lack of linguistic knowledge. This is as long as two-way communication can assist each other’s understanding of language context.
- There is more and more outrage and anger common in society today Why is this Is this a positive or a negative development 67
- People now days send text massages more frequently than they talk the phone What are the reasons for this trend Do the advantages of texting outweigh the disadvantages 89
- More and more people today are visiting extreme places such as Antarctica or the Sahara desert What are the advantages and disadvantages of such travels 95
- Many would argue that scientific research requires a degree of oversight from the relevant governmental authorities In my opinion properly handled this is a sensible and necessary policy What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 84
- People now have the freedom to work and live anywhere in the world due to the development of communication technology and transportation Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the students') or simply say ''Most students''.
Suggestion: Most of the students; Most students
... the new languages needs a longer time. Most of students in the developing countries have been f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 672, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'create'
Suggestion: create
...n trade due to language barrier. It can creates substantial gaps among workers and empl...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, then, well, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1826.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.18983050847 5.12529762239 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43039123535 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.698305084746 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.9233491596 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 121.733333333 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110483688004 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0328199839156 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353153681326 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0656873032988 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021175677835 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.62 12.4159519038 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.86 8.58950901804 138% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 78.4519038076 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.