Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn about news. However, others believe that they can learn news more effectively through other media. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Many people opine that newspapers are the superior means to receive news as they are more trustworthy and comprehensive. However, others think that media such as social media and TV news programs are better as they can provide quick and descriptive news. I agree with the advocates for other media because of my belief that they can also deliver the news with the same quality as newspapers.
Newspapers are more credible. They are often written by professional journalists and writers from renowned companies. Because of that, they are often well-researched and checked to ensure that they are correct. Furthermore, newspapers can provide their readers with a rigorous account of a certain event. Words can fit in a substantial amount of information. Thus, writers have more space to incorporate details such as the causes and the solutions, educating the readers in addition to informing them of the news. For example, magazines such as The New York Times or The Guardians still have myriad people subscribe to them because of their accuracy and comprehensiveness.
Other media can deliver news more quickly. With the advent of the Internet and social media, people can keep abreast of the latest happenings worldwide. Such speed can give individuals time to prepare for the situation and give them advantages over others. Moreover, news in the form of videos is more effective in describing an event. Using animated pictures can provide watchers with a vivid and engaging view. For instance, news about World Cup 2022 delivered through videos can show the goals and the cheers, enriching the experience of those who missed the matches. I agree with this perspective because news can come from the same organization, giving other formats the same qualities newspapers have by having the same scripts.
In conclusion, whilst newspapers are accurate and attentive to details. Social media and TV news can also have the same characteristics with the added benefits of fast and animated views.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-22 | MinhGoal1 | 84 | view |
| 2023-11-14 | Bigk016 | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-21 | iwannakillmelmao | 92 | view |
| 2021-02-05 | nobita | 73 | view |
| 2020-02-28 | Thang Tran | 87 | view |
- More people today put their personal and private information online address telephone number credit card number to do everyday activities such as banking shopping and socializing Is this a positive or negative development 73
- Children today find it difficult to concentrate on or to pay attention to school What are the reasons How can we solve this problem 67
- In many countries children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people think that the government should have the responsibility To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Many employees can now do their work from home using modern technology However this change may only benefit workers not the employers To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Crime appears to be rising in most countries in the world especially among young people Identify the possible causes of this trend and propose some solutions you think would be effective 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...l media and TV news programs are better as they can provide quick and descriptive ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, moreover, so, still, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22670807453 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83331442211 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515527950311 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2335149848 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5789473684 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9473684211 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47368421053 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320123041806 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106897031994 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076751743872 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204900694006 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0947270103141 0.056905535591 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.