Do you agree that modern technology has given us more leisure time than before.
The 21st century has seen the dramatic breakthrough in technology which has profound impact on the way of human life. It is argued that we are having more free time thanks to the advances of technology. Although there are several opinions around this issue, I would say that technology has given more leisure time for people than in the past.
Housework was a nightmare with housewife until the invention of technological devices designed for solving housework problems. In the past, people had to deal with the vicious circle of doing chores and taking care of their children. Moreover, woman just held a peripheral role in this society. With this conception, it was common that woman had to sacrifice their career for their family or they would find it difficult to achieve a work-life balance if they wanted to continue their job. But in today’s society, there are several inventions of housework machines like dish washer or washing machine. People, especially woman, have more free time for themselves. They can do lots of thing which was seemed to be impossible in the past. My mother, for example, had to struggle with washing cloths and housework every day. But thanks to the washing machine, now she has more time to enjoy her life and take up a yoga classes for her interest.
Technical development has played as an effective labour-saving method because of the ability to solve the geography distance issue. With just a single click, business man can create a video conference so that they do not have to waste time to take a long trip to an arranged location for their meeting. The government can take advantage of these devices for children living in rural area by increasing the provision of virtual classes. As a result, they will have more time to do homework and can avoid danger occurring along their way to school.
In conclusion, cutting-edge technology has a positive effect on our life and brings a plenty of time for human life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-25 | elham mousavi | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-14 | elham mousavi | 61 | view |
| 2024-09-09 | elham mousavi | 61 | view |
| 2024-08-20 | Anmol Bal | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-14 | elham mousavi | 56 | view |
- Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds Do you agree or disagree about this opinion 89
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Do you agree that modern technology has given us more leisure time than before 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 676, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun thing seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of things'.
Suggestion: lots of things
...e free time for themselves. They can do lots of thing which was seemed to be impossible in th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86526946108 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61306586878 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571856287425 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.577329213 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5882352941 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6470588235 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64705882353 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168456766849 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583048950957 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667710017452 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121927659592 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743135150438 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.