"The following appeared as part of a petition sent to residents of Youngtown by an environmental protection group:
"The Smith Corporation shouldn't be permitted to develop the land that is now part of the Youngtown Wildlife Preserve. This sanctuary is essential to the survival of the 300 bird species that live in our area. Although only a small percentage of the land will be sold to Smith,the proposed development will have disastrous consequences for our area. The company plans to build a small hotel on the land. Although they have promised to ensure the preservation of the sanctuary,there is no way that their plans will do anything but harm the sanctuary. There are no circumstances under which this sale will benefit our community, which relies on tourists who visit primarily to see our magnificent bird population."" -
Write a response in which you examine the started and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
In this argument, particular petition sent to residents of Youngtown by an environmental protection group is stated. In this petition, environmental protection group is protesting about not to develop land of sanctuary because community of that area is relying on tourist, who wants to see that bird sanctuary. Environmental group is trying for saving environment, this is good but there are certain assumption present in this petition which is weakening the argument.
Here, in petition it is mentioned that particular sanctuary is owned by Youngtown wildlife preserves. And arguing that smith corporation should not give this land for developing it. An environmental protection cannot oppose to this situation, because there is no mention that smith corporation will cultivate the trees. Smith Corporation may develop the land and will have positive impact on tourism. In this part there is assumption made by environmental protection group that this will spoil the sanctuary.
There is another assumption. Here, small part of the sanctuary is given to Smith Corporation and environmental protection group is claiming that it will have disastrous consequence for our area. This assumption should be clarified with smith corporation that how they are planning to develop it? If there is bad impact of their decision, then only they should protest.
Another assumption is about building of hotel will harm the sanctuary and life of that area's community. This area's community is relying on tourism. And hotel is best way to attract tourism because it will ensure pursuit of tourist. Smith Corporation is also ensuring the preservation of sanctuary. In this case Smith Corporation is right. If there is another problem about harming the sanctuary, then it must be discussed. Primary focus of tourist is to see bird sanctuary but idea of making hotel will not lose the tourism. Otherwise, hotel will attract more tourism and will help economically to that area's community.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-05-29 | jcsilv | 66 | view |
| 2016-08-06 | jessicamdesai | 83 | view |
| 2016-08-04 | shachand9 | 75 | view |
| 2016-07-05 | rajpatel9498 | 50 | view |
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that the person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot per 50
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 50
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.Write a response in which you discu 50
- An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition. 50
- "The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in a 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In this argument, particular petition se...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ition which is weakening the argument. Here, in petition it is mentioned that p...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...up that this will spoil the sanctuary. There is another assumption. Here, small...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cision, then only they should protest. Another assumption is about building of ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 164, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
...munity is relying on tourism. And hotel is best way to attract tourism because it will ...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'then']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.260233918129 0.25644967241 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.190058479532 0.15541462614 122% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0672514619883 0.0836205057962 80% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0380116959064 0.0520304965353 73% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0292397660819 0.0272364105082 107% => OK
Prepositions: 0.122807017544 0.125424944231 98% => OK
Participles: 0.0584795321637 0.0416121511921 141% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.96506961193 2.79052419416 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0263157894737 0.026700313972 99% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0847953216374 0.113004496875 75% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0438596491228 0.0255425247493 172% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00877192982456 0.0127820249294 69% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1998.0 2731.13054187 73% => OK
No of words: 311.0 446.07635468 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.42443729904 6.12365571057 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.57801047555 92% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.363344051447 0.378187486979 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.32154340836 0.287650121315 112% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.24115755627 0.208842608468 115% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.192926045016 0.135150697306 143% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96506961193 2.79052419416 106% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 207.018472906 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.440514469453 0.469332199767 94% => OK
Word variations: 42.9923716986 52.1807786196 82% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.039408867 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.55 23.2022227129 67% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9344292741 57.7814097925 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9 141.986410481 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.55 23.2022227129 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.3 0.724660767414 41% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.14285714286 78% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.58251231527 140% => OK
Readability: 47.704340836 51.9672348444 92% => OK
Elegance: 1.71590909091 1.8405768891 93% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.527470702533 0.441005458295 120% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.13563054958 0.135418324435 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0719054080521 0.0829849096947 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.515861139234 0.58762219726 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.130773635959 0.147661913831 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.205031512961 0.193483328276 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105458663472 0.0970749176394 109% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.457862203722 0.42659136922 107% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0344751768893 0.0774707102158 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.3884704317 0.312017818177 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485881079933 0.0698173142475 70% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.33743842365 60% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.87684729064 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.82512315271 124% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 6.46551724138 31% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 5.36822660099 56% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.82389162562 71% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 14.657635468 48% => More topic words wanted.
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.