Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Art is a major part of the culture of a society. It portrays the traditions, the rituals, and views of the society. Moreover, art is the source of beautification and enhances the meaning of itself and its surroundings. It is a channel for exemplifying beauty of many forms but is also a medium for voicing concerns and portraying evils as well. Humans thrive in a society full of various art forms. It is one the oldest and innate requirements of humans to surround ourselves with beauty. Cave drawings and architecture of Ajanta and Allora caves of India are some of the finest art examples. A society devoid of art would be grey and monotonous devoid of joys that art brings into our lives.
In today’s world, success is an outcome of hard work and promotion. Even for any artwork to be successful, it has to be promoted in the society. People have to aware of the artwork produced by the artists to actually visit and appreciate their work. Sadly apart from a small section of rich artists, many can’t afford to financially support their requirements and to promote their work. Thus government funding for the arts ensures that the artist doesn’t have to worry about the finances and funding for their work. Furthermore government funding would ensure appropriate promotional support for such artist as well which would be at a much larger and public scale than any individual or organization.
In addition, since a major part of the society live in a democracy they have a right to voice their opinion. It is a fundamental right of the citizens. However anti-nationalistic views which threaten the peace and balance of the society must be banned. They not only promote undesirable and destructive views but can also result in inciting people creating ruckus and chaos in the society. Such views, even in art work should be stopped and restricted from showcasing the public. Banning of such artworks doesn’t degrade the integrity of arts instead is a source of menace.
Hence, government funding is important for the upkeep of the art world of the society. It is an important factor for a thriving art society and to promote budding and upcoming artists. Moreover, instead of threatening the integrity of the arts, it boots and enhances it by keeping away the nuisances who are not contributing anything noteworthy to the society.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 50
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 83
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition. 50
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...requirements and to promote their work. Thus government funding for the arts ensures...
^^^^
Line 3, column 533, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...he finances and funding for their work. Furthermore government funding would ensure appropr...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...is a fundamental right of the citizens. However anti-nationalistic views which threaten...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'apart from', 'as to', 'in addition']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.263982102908 0.240241500013 110% => OK
Verbs: 0.140939597315 0.157235817809 90% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0805369127517 0.0880659088768 91% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0447427293065 0.0497285424764 90% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0425055928412 0.0444667217837 96% => OK
Prepositions: 0.120805369128 0.12292977631 98% => OK
Participles: 0.0335570469799 0.0406280797675 83% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.89470085858 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0246085011186 0.030933414821 80% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.10514541387 0.0997080785238 105% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0156599552573 0.0249443105267 63% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0111856823266 0.0148568991511 75% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2365.0 2732.02544248 87% => OK
No of words: 397.0 452.878318584 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.95717884131 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.58838876751 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.367758186398 0.366273622748 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.282115869018 0.280924506359 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.183879093199 0.200843997647 92% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.115869017632 0.132149295362 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89470085858 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 219.290929204 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496221662469 0.48968727796 101% => OK
Word variations: 54.0368442572 55.4138127331 98% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6194690265 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.2608695652 23.380412469 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7304019808 59.4972553346 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.826086957 141.124799967 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2608695652 23.380412469 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.608695652174 0.674092028746 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 45.472456467 51.4728631049 88% => OK
Elegance: 1.83333333333 1.64882698954 111% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.517996849322 0.391690518653 132% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.131576161183 0.123202303941 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0671024374832 0.077325440228 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.526537786482 0.547984918172 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.112153792225 0.149214159877 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.203069464746 0.161403998019 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111299127131 0.0892212321368 125% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.408123366369 0.385218514788 106% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0521226033619 0.0692045440612 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.384046469235 0.275328986314 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301475454543 0.0653680567796 46% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.30420353982 132% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.66592920354 164% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.5995575221 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.