Arctic deer live on islands in Canada's arctic regions. They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year. Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enough, at least some of the year, for the ice to cover the sea separating the islands, allowing the deer to travel over it. Unfortunately, according to reports from local hunters, the deer populations are declining. Since these reports coincide with recent global warming trends that have caused the sea ice to melt, we can conclude that the purported decline in deer populations is the result of the deer's being unable to follow their age-old migration patterns across the frozen sea.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument
Authors conclusion is unjustifiable and it may divagate people who read this report. The author's conclusion is so fast and the author cannot give a report just by an authentic report. Though, the population of deer is wanning due to global warming is agreeable but not only with an authentic report that reported by local predators. Aside from these, the author cannot conclude with one report and at least some other reasons should be considered for conclusion.
The reduction of arctic deers is indiscernible and it cannot conclude just by one report. May be, the principal reason of the deer's reduction is the existence of predators. Predators may create a big fear in deers. Also, the presence of local hunters by itself would be the original cause of the deer's reduction. Deers feel unsafe and prevent mating.
One other reasons that caused this report be unbelievable is that, if global warming affect on the deer's population so other animals that live there such as : birds, arctic beer and etc may be faced with mitigation. So, it could be imagined that, principal reason of deer's reduction cannot be global warming.
Another reason that can criticize author's conclusion is that, with warming the global may deers face with lack of nutrition and the plants that deers use. So, lack of beneficent materials to eat can affect on the deer's population. Even, the absence of enough material for making a place to live by warming the global can be the important for the reduction of them.
With all that said, also lack of proportional mate can cause the reduction of deers and hamper them to mate and consequently the population of deers be wanned. Lack of mating can be due to climate changes.
It should be considered that, disease or existence of some viruses or bacteria or even body immunity system problems in face with diseases can be the principal of deer's mortality.
Conclusively, the argument given by the author is not reliable and the author cannot conclude with only one reason that may that report be aunthetic.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | jenniferjack07 | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | lanhhoang | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | ken10091995 | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | nimesh94 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | farhadmoqimi | 63 | view |
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 50
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making. 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...vagate people who read this report. The authors conclusion is so fast and the author ca...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 127, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'deers'' or 'deer's'?
Suggestion: deers'; deer's
...rt. May be, the principal reason of the deers reduction is the existence of predators...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 297, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'deers'' or 'deer's'?
Suggestion: deers'; deer's
...self would be the original cause of the deers reduction. Deers feel unsafe and preven...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...unbelievable is that, if global warming affect on the deers population so other animals t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'deers'' or 'deer's'?
Suggestion: deers'; deer's
...s that, if global warming affect on the deers population so other animals that live t...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 199, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...lack of beneficent materials to eat can affect on the deers population. Even, the absence...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 213, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'deers'' or 'deer's'?
Suggestion: deers'; deer's
...cent materials to eat can affect on the deers population. Even, the absence of enough...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, so, then, at least, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.6327345309 112% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.9520958084 162% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 11.1786427146 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 28.8173652695 76% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 55.5748502994 76% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 16.3942115768 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 2260.96107784 75% => OK
No of words: 345.0 441.139720559 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89855072464 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.56307096286 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60734011203 2.78398813304 94% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 204.123752495 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.44347826087 0.468620217663 95% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 705.55239521 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.471057884232 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.315194553 57.8364921388 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8888888889 119.503703932 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 23.324526521 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38888888889 5.70786347227 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 5.15768463074 136% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 5.25449101796 133% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0818151964406 0.218282227539 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0336176131785 0.0743258471296 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325429951689 0.0701772020484 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0444937489186 0.128457276422 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349088830235 0.0628817314937 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.3799401198 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.3550499002 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.197005988 78% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.5979740519 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.32208582834 93% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 98.500998004 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to improve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.