Which one do you prefer? students in high school should learn by sitting there listening to the teacher while taking notes or communicating and sharing ideas with class.
No one can cast a shadow of doubt of the fact that education has a paramount role in the people’s life. Thus societies attempt to provide a suitable situation for improving students and suggest them the best method for better learning in the class. Not all people concur when this issue arise. Being cognizant to the logic behind those who endorse or repudiate the legitimacy of this contention, not having any biased perception, I presume that students could learn better by taking part in discussions in the class and trying to convey their ideas to each other in the class. Among a plentitude of the reasons in support of this assertion, better performance and improve students’ social skills could be picked out for further analysis.
To commence with, a consensus has yet to be reached; however, regarding the benefits of participating in conversations in the class for improving students’ gain in the class, based upon of the statistics of different general questionnaires of variety of schools, students are unanimous about the conviction that sharing idea in the class help them to broaden their horizon about special issue. To elucidate on, they will be familiar with different viewpoint toward an problem and when they state their idea, they found some flaws of their solution. In addition, this atmosphere in the class encourages them to boom their knowledge in facing with friend ideas. Indeed, this method of teaching will make a healthy and righteous competition among students and they want to show themselves to the teacher and their friends. Thus, they urge to working hard in their studying, and it results in better marks at final exam for them.
In addition to the reason raised above; blossoming some social skills of students could also substantiate the justifiability of the claim made at the out set of this essay. In conjunction with public belief, communication with each other decrease their shying feels and they learn how to contact with each other in a polite way. For example, I used to be shy but when at the high school our teacher forces us to talk about different biological issues every week and to argue with each other, it could increase my self-confidence and I left this improper behave by helping this talk show.
Taking an impartial position, not to turn a blind eye to the deleterious effect of this method, it should be accentuated that this method takes a lot of time in the class; however, the time of the class is limited and teacher should manage their time to transfer all required knowledge to students. Nevertheless, merits of the sharing method take precedence over its infinitesimal disadvantageous.
Drawing upon to the above reasons, discreetly put, as far as my personal perspective on the topic is concerned, I reiterate that participating in some debates in the class and expressing our ideas toward the class issue results in a better learning for us. Not only, it gives us a better performance in the learning process but also it is useful for improving our communication skills.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific solutions presented the reading passage. 3
- Which one do you prefer? students in high school should learn by sitting there listening to the teacher while taking notes or communicating and sharing ideas with class. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should take basic science courses regardless of their fields of study. 36
- Which one of the following values is the most important to share with a young child 5 10 years old 1 being helpful 2 Being honest 3 Being well organized 87
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which work is the best thing to do? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ramount role in the people's life. Thus societies attempt to provide a suitable...
^^^^
Line 1, column 472, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...on, I presume that students could learn better by taking part in discussions in the cl...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 470, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...amiliar with different viewpoint toward an problem and when they state their idea,...
^^
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a polite way" with adverb for "polite"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ey learn how to contact with each other in a polite way. For example, I used to be shy but when...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, thus, as to, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => OK
Preposition: 93.0 52.1666666667 178% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2551.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 510.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00196078431 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75217629947 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86385218991 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51568627451 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 775.8 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.659849047 48.9658058833 179% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.058823529 100.406767564 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 20.6045352989 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.29411764706 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213957111396 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668849013619 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423771798309 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11987126975 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0124102576623 0.0645574589148 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 11.7677419355 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 86.8835125448 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.