The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.
The table presents the data about the urban railway networks in six major cities around the world.
It is clear that the table compares the railway systems in the year opened, their total path lengths and the number of travellers using them each year. Overall, the three oldest networks are much larger than the younger ones.
Opened earliest, London railway network has the biggest size out of the six railway systems, which is nearly 100 kilometers longer than the underground system in Paris and is more than two times that in Tokyo. However, while the number of passengers using train each year in London is just 775 million people, there are about almost three times that of Tokyo and nearly 1200 million travellers in Paris.
The numbers of people commuting by train in Washington DC, Kyoto and Los Angeles are much fewer than other metropolises. Washington DC underground is the most extensive, with 126 kilometers compared to only 11 kilometers in Kyoto and 28 kilometers in Los Angeles. The Los Angeles network is the newest, having opened in 2001, while the 11-kilometer Kyoto system serves only 45 million people each year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | snowsss | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | snowsss | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | Adeola Nafisat | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | habeeb omran | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | AFSAL | 11 | view |
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 88
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990. 61
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990. 73
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990. 73
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 955.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37677882901 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55497382199 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3526858652 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.375 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176255167481 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791030429064 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801386596844 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127164866042 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688074753938 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.