Damage to the environment is an inevitable consequence of worldwide improvements in the standard of living. Discuss.
Human beings are always greedy, and they would do anything to improve their living standarts. Everybody wants to live in a big house, and use the most quality products that technology can provide them in every sector. They want fast cars, special jets etc. On the to these, humans are missing the most important thing which is the increasing amount of damage that they give to nature.
In ancient times there were no pollution like in these days. This is because of the technology which humans are using for their own interests. Refrigerators, for instance, were invented to make foods cool and fresh. However, while it is cooling inside it gives heat to outside, basic physics, and it causes global warming. Deodorants, for example, are invented to prevent people from smelling bad, but it has a really serious side effect which is damaging the ozone layer that protects our world from the harmful effects of the Sun.
While we are trying to make our lives better, we are destroying our future. Back in the days, people were using horses or sailed ships to travel. But, today we use cars and big commercial jets to travel faster and faster, and it causes carbon monoxide gases to oscillate to earth which poisons the nature.
People also make wars to live better. They have even used atomic bomb over Japan which caused thousands of deaths, and diseases that spread year in and year out. Now they are making wars for energy sources to make their lives better than the others. Big companies occupied the forest to make residences, and kill the animals.
In conclusion, the improvement of technology to improve living standarts is killing the environment. Because, we, humans are greedy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-06 | fatemeh fazli | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-06 | fatemeh fazli | 92 | view |
| 2019-08-06 | fatemeh fazli | 84 | view |
| 2018-08-02 | geethu | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-06 | fatemeh fazli | 11 | view |
- The charts below give information about world spending and population.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisonswhere relevant.Write at least 150 words 73
- Some people support modern developments in agriculture such as factory farming and creation ofnew types of fruits and vegetables. However, other people oppose this view.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged.Others believe that children who are taught to co-operate rather than compete become more useful adults.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 56
- Damage to the environment is an inevitable consequence of worldwide improvements in the standard of living Discuss 95
- Universities should provide students with the skills they will require in order to succeed at their future jobs How far do you agree or disagree with the above opinion What are some of the job skills that employers look for in new employees 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt of damage that they give to nature. In ancient times there were no pollution...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, really, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90625 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34814402922 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607638888889 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.4105082005 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.5 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38888888889 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0398539723328 0.244688304435 16% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.013447908105 0.084324248473 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0294970405583 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0313067825347 0.151304729494 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354893817444 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 0.67 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.