Some people say that it is possible for a country to be both economically successful and have a clean environment. Some others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Many people think that it is impossible for a nation to both achieve sustainable economic progress and have a clean environment. While this is justifiable to some degree, I still believe that the non- stop progress of the economy is the principal cause for the environmental degradation
On the one hand, it is understandable why some people think that a country can be both economically successful and have a clean environment. Firstly, the sustainable development of the economy enables leaders of many countries to invest more state money in advanced technologis which are environmentally friendly and provide renewable energy. With the advent of alternative sources of energy, the combustion of fossil fuels such as coal and oil to meet the escalating energy demand nationwide would be reduced, greatly alleviating environmental problems. Secondly, achieving economic goals is the foundation of adequate employment opportunities. With better means of obtaining money, people would have various chances to broaden thier knowledge about the importance of environmental protection. As a result, the amount of household waste ilegally released into the environment would be minimized, which enables a nation to gain a healthy and sustainable development.
On the other hand, I still believe that it is impossible for a country to both gain economic goals and keep the environment clean. As a matter of fact, in order to become economically successful, the exploitation of natural resources in many countries such as China or Vietnam has been rising significantly to supply a major part of electricity and energy for most manufacturers nationwide. This leads to the depletion of natural resources, which has tremendous negative effects on the environment. Additonally, the non-stop progress of the economy also allows citizens to enjoy a more decent standard of living, which might cause severe damage to the evironment. For example, with greater disposable income, the number of private car owners in some nations has been constantly growing at an unprecedented rate. This results in a rise in the society ‘s carbon footprint, which greatly contributes to the air pollution.
In conlusion, while many people think that a country can both achieve econimoic goals and successfully preserve the environment, i sitll belive that the growth of the economy poses a grave threat to the environment of a country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-16 | havudieulinh | 89 | view |
| 2018-11-01 | Tracyphi | 84 | view |
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose and can even be damaging. To waht extent do do agree or disagree? 84
- Today more people are travelling than ever before. Why this is the case ? What are the benetfits of travelling to travelers. 84
- Some people think that good health is very important to every person so medical service should not be run by profit making companies Do the advantages of private health care outweigh the disadvantages 87
- In many countries, more and more people choose to buy imported food rather than food produced locally. Why do people buy imported foood? What could be done to encourage people to buy local food? 95
- International travel can make people prejudiced rather than broad minded. Why people fail to benefit when they travel? What we can do to improve their understanding of the countries they visit? 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 57, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ile many people think that a country can both achieve econimoic goals and success...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2041.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42819148936 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18922681325 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529255319149 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 658.8 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.1202941778 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.785714286 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8571428571 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301652751394 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100562431838 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107820294854 0.0667982634062 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194423412143 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483617911822 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 22.5 9.78957915832 230% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.