A common marketing strategy for big companies is to introduce various offers and discounts. However, these strategies may have impact on their reputation. What are some of the impacts? Support your point of view with details from your own experiences.
These days, there is a controversial debate between members of society about the impacts of discounts on company reputation. There are a great number of people who interpret the impacts of various offers and discounts as thoroughly constructive, while others hold an opponent view. In this essay I elucidate my point of view by discussing both sides of argument.
On one hand, it is argued that discounts plays a pivotal role in economic prosperity of a company. This is attributed to the fact that these offers would attract a tremendous number of customers to the products of the company, therefore it would create a feeling of accomplishment and competence, which consequently open avenues to new achievements so that the company's enthusiasm and determination will be amplified towards many daunting tasks. Take Apple company for example, even those who do not need a cell phone with all those functionalities possess an apple phone because of the great discount provided.
On the other hand, there are a number of people who hold a different view and believe that not having these types of discount is more advantageous. This is to say that without these offers people will buy the products because of their quality, which would instill a strong feeling of self-esteem in employees so that they are more likely to do up to expectations. Specifically, a research study conducted at Yale University in 2016 found that not providing various offers and relying on quality of products enhance workers intellectual abilities to make better decisions related to social and personal life.
To recapitulate, the foregoing discussion propounded the view that discount strategies would enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of marketing strategies and will increase the customer's confidence into the products of a company. It is expected that companies take cognizance of these facts and adopt methods of providing better discount for their customers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-01-13 | mojtaba1980 | 88 | view |
| 2019-01-07 | mojtaba1980 | 88 | view |
| 2018-04-23 | mojtaba1980 | 80 | view |
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you support them or not. 61
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you support them or not. 11
- Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. What extent do you agree or disagree. 80
- In underdeveloped countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said the opposite as well. Discuss your opinions and give examples. 85
- Nowadays most people choose to throw away broken things instead of repairing them, and replace them with new ones. Why is this happening? What problems may it lead to? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 458, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Apple) must be used with a third-person verb: 'companies'.
Suggestion: companies
...towards many daunting tasks. Take Apple company for example, even those who do not need...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'customers'' or 'customer's'?
Suggestion: customers'; customer's
...keting strategies and will increase the customers confidence into the products of a compa...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 5.94088669951 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 311.0 242.827586207 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29260450161 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04570356598 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546623794212 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 516.6 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.325123152709 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.5024630542 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.6796730101 50.4703680194 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.636363636 104.977214359 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2727272727 20.9669160288 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18152382924 0.242375264174 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699040768256 0.0925447433944 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401562841785 0.071462118173 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117646654798 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489193996677 0.0609392437508 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 12.6369458128 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 53.1260098522 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.3980295567 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.