Some people believe that if a police force carries guns, this encourages higher level of violence in that society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Finding ways to support policemen in the war against crime has long been a topic of concern in today’s society. While I agree that carrying guns along with police could result in a potentially higher rate of violence, I believe that guns are necessary for police when they are on duty.
On the one hand, it may be true that the image of armed policemen could create a misperception in the mind of young adults and children. They may simply think that possessing a weapon is acceptable since it can be used to protect them in threatened situation. However, without being educated about the deadly consequences of using guns, adolescents could be unaware of the possible injuries and pain caused to others. Moreover, there is a risk of accidents and mistakes with guns . Policemen could lose control and shoot unarmed criminal or innocent person, which creates a fear among citizens. These things can lead to higher level of violence in the society.
On the other hand, since the job of protecting citizens by police officers is highly dangerous, guns play an important role in the war against crime. Their life is threatened by criminals who carry knifes or even guns, so they need to be equipped with proper weapons to ensure that they can fight back when they are attacked by criminals. Sometimes, they may even have to shoot the serial killer down with a gun when it is necessary. Secondly, by using guns, police officers can force an offender to surrender. It becomes easier to arrest someone and avoid physical violence. Without guns, suspects could escape and pose a serious threat to the public.
In conclusion, although police force carry guns along with them can has some drawbacks, I belive that it brings more desirable results.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-30 | Patricias | 78 | view |
| 2018-06-29 | maytrang | 84 | view |
| 2018-06-20 | sarkariasaab8@email .com | 67 | view |
| 2018-03-20 | linhoang997 | 56 | view |
| 2017-06-16 | MinhNgoc 299 | 61 | view |
- Due to increasing world demands for oil and gas energy people need to look for new sources of energy in remote and untouched natural places Do advantages of locating these sources outweigh disadvantages damaging such places 82
- Some people think that school should reward students who show the best academic results, while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- Some people think that shops should not be allowed to sell food or drinks that are scientifically proven to be bad for people s health Do you agree or disagree 77
- Some people think they have the right to use as much as fresh water they want others believe government should control the use of water as it limited resource Discuss both views and give your opinion 80
- Some people think they have the right to use as much as fresh water they want, others believe government should control the use of water as it limited resource. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 480, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...risk of accidents and mistakes with guns . Policemen could lose control and shoot ...
^^
Line 4, column 69, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...ce force carry guns along with them can has some drawbacks, I belive that it brings...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89225589226 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56171296529 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582491582492 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.833765688 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8666666667 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16474535752 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562477916722 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602567339677 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114183615368 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355849181107 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.