The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph illustrates the amount of fish and some different kinds of meat which people in a European country are consumed from 1979 to 2004.

Overall, the consumption of beef and lamb decreased gradually, while there was a significant increase in the figure for chicken. In addition, the consumption of fish is lowest all most time surveyed.

In 1979, the amount of beef which was consumed was highest at about 220 grams per person per week. The figures for chicken and lamp were lower, at under 150 grams and exactly 150 grams respectively while only about 60 grams of fish are consumed.

In the period from 1979 to 2004, the European country saw a dramatic increase in the consumption of chicken, reaching the highest point at around 220 grams in 2004. However, over 50 grams of lamb was consumed, compared to under 50 grams of fish in 2004. There was a steady decline in the amount of beef. which fell to over 100 grams by the year 2004.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-24 pateldhruv1708 67 view
2019-12-22 Lovepreet123 67 view
2019-12-15 KIM JINUK 56 view
2019-12-15 KIM JINUK 56 view
2019-11-09 anasrafiq 73 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by user sonchip96hb :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 305, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...a steady decline in the amount of beef. which fell to over 100 grams by the year 2004...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 305, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...a steady decline in the amount of beef. which fell to over 100 grams by the year 2004...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 786.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65088757396 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41686823327 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508875739645 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4428060445 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3333333333 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171767819299 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820544781801 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0992280522748 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138990318369 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117622986497 0.0819641961636 144% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.