Students in high school should learn by sitting there listening to the teacher while taking notes or communicating and sharing ideas with class
Throughout history, the education has been altering dramatically. In contrast to the past, students just listened to their teachers, and they were the only one talking in the class, modern education system encourages teachers to let the pupils take part in class discussion further. Although a plethora of people contend that communicating with other classmates may be influential, I, to a great extent, take the opposing perspective that student should put their efforts to learn as much as possible in the class. My reasons are manifold, among which the most conspicuous ones are substantiated in the following paragraphs.
To commence with, the first exquisite point to be mentioned is the importance of paying attention during a lecture. Beyond a shadow of a doubt, focusing on the teacher's talk, student can gain more information. They are able to take note completely as the teacher is providing some information. On the contrary, if students discuss and communicate with other students, there is less possibility that they can get the majority of helpful materials which are presented by the teacher. Moreover, for a lecturer it is indeed arduous to keep focus on the speech while the audiences are talking, on the grounds that any noise is interrupting. Hence, the more discussions exist in the class, the less engaging lecture the teacher can provide.
Besides the influences on discussing during class time, it is worth mentioning that pupils do not have access to their teacher all day long, but they spend more time with their friends. As a result, it is more reasonable that they make attempt to take advantage of information given in the class since cannot access those informative materials in other situations. As a matter of fact, learning in the class are more efficient approach in comparison to information they can obtain through other sources due to the fact it is organized in a logical order that can help learners to understand them instantly. For instance, students can learn many things during class, and then they discuss the topic in their meeting with other classmates. Hence, they both get a large proportion of what is stated in lecture and share their knowledge, viewpoint, and attitude in their meeting off class.
To sum up, considering the aforementioned arguments, we may draw the conclusion that it is more far better to pay all the attention on what is said during a class since it brings numerous advantages. Not only does it contribute to gaining more information, but it also augments students' learning process.
- teachers have a higher effect on students rather than their friends 76
- TPO49 95
- advantages of the clouding seeding schemes 80
- Archaeology study probelm 3
- it would be better to be informed about various events happening in the world even they do not have any apparent/conspicuous impact on our daily life directly 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 496, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nformation they can obtain through other sources due to the fact it is organized ...
^^
Line 7, column 297, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
... but it also augments students learning process.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, if, may, moreover, so, then, while, for instance, in contrast, as a matter of fact, as a result, in contrast to, on the contrary, to sum up, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2145.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10714285714 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86718374549 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540476190476 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2771691009 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.176470588 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7058823529 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2941176471 5.45110844103 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261442043827 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819898871597 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586657919943 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156092329589 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607137189764 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.