Today more and more people are using mobile phones and computers. Thus, people are losing the ability to communicate face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that mobile phones and computers play an integral part in our lives. While I accept that the development of technology may meet our demand for living, I believe that it also could diminish people's communication ability.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that high-tech appliances are playing a vital role in almost every aspect of life. Firstly, technology gives users countless opportunities to make friends from various countries without traveling across the world. Therefore, they could save a great deal of time and money by doing this. Secondly, the availability of high-quality digital devices makes a great contribution to enhancing the level of job performance. For example, in the worlds of business and education, video conferencing has enabled to exchange ideas, discuss about work and help employee complete task instead of wasting too much time to arrange a meeting.
On the other hand, there are several reasons why mobile phones and computers have to take responsibility for the decline of people's communication skills. First reason is that because of extremely focusing on cell phones or computers, people are likely to use less time with their true friends and their relatives. As a result, they will not know how to build a strong relationship and how to manage conflicts. Furthermore, by using mobile phones for a long time, people have a hard time mastering vital soft skills. For instance, in many families, young people have more tendency to chat with someone they do not even know and may be dangerous as criminal through technological devices, while their parents would like to watch TV in order to update breaking news. Consequently, teenagers can not strengthen the relationship between the members of family as well as limiting the verbal skill.
In conclusion, although technology brings some convenience to people, it seems to me that the usage of mobile phones and computers can be a reduction in the capability of communication among people.
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport why is it not popular in many places? How to increase its popularity 89
- Some people think success in life comes from hard work and determination Others think money and appearance are more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 80
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views 73
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
- The best way for government to solve the problem of traffic congestion is providing free public transport in 24 hours per day, and seven days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.173374613 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90510716723 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61919504644 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3908407593 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.357142857 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.0714285714 7.06120827912 213% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17005557891 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519969486351 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523519603159 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0903547748306 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628304553775 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.