Some people think that the government should invest in teaching science rather than in other subjects for a country development and progress. What extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that some people think that the government budget for education should be the priority to science subjects rather than others, in terms of developing country and progress. While I accept that increase in scientific developments makes a valuable contribution to the growth of the nation, I also disagree that science is the primary contributor.
On the one hand, there are a variety of reasons why the government should pump a huge amount of money into teaching science to boost country and societies function. First reason is that increase in electrical and computer based technologies have led to enhance the level of performance job. As a result, it is a good chance for both individuals and companies to improve the quality of personal life as well as promote the prosperity of the economy. For example, thanks to the availability of technologies such as simulator software, workers in the companies save a great deal of time to analyse results without measuring directly. Furthermore, if young generation is equipped with fundamental comprehension of knowledge related to science, they will be able to broaden their own knowledge to discover something new. For instance, sources of renewable energy such as solar and wind generated power are achievements of the process of enlarging their knowledge. This development helps the government relieve the pressure on fossil fuels sources.
On the other hand, local authorities have different reasons apart from science subjects to dedicate in other fields. Firstly, it is essential for youngsters to learn English which plays an indispensable role in fostering economic growth. For example, if the businessman has master English skills, they have countless opportunities to exchange ideas and discuss work without existing language barriers between any part of the worlds. Secondly, creation subjects such as art, music allow individuals expand their imagination. For instance, in developing countries have talented people in drawing field, it means that they can make a beautiful picture to sell.
In conclusion, although science sector has the positive influence on national development, I also consider that there exist some other important factors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-21 | dhruv j patel | 61 | view |
| 2018-08-05 | BlaBlaBla | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-19 | maiphuonganh | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-23 | caigicungduoc | 78 | view |
| 2018-08-05 | BlaBlaBla | 95 | view |
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views 73
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport why is it not popular in many places? How to increase its popularity 89
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- In some countries, many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 61
- Today more and more people are using mobile phones and computers Thus people are losing the ability to communicate face to face To what extent do you agree or disagree 69
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, apart from, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1879.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44637681159 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96021366532 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3599893419 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.266666667 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0666666667 7.06120827912 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29165054024 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08482750228 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108126057673 0.0667982634062 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180407455181 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120192480085 0.056905535591 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.