Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more
effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Throughout history, in all civilized societies, the issue of student's project engendered copious controversies among people. Some people incline toward the opinion is that it is more beneficial for students to work together on projects. However, some other may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that it is vital and crucial to work alone on projects. At my vantage point, when teachers assign projects, it is necessary for juvenile since they learn much more. In the following paragraphs, I will pinpoint the most outstanding reasons.
A further more subtle point is that students extend their knowledge by work with their classmates. Students can share and exchange their knowledge with each other when students create a group. For instance, a group of students who work on a project expresses their idea and solution precisely and by this way, they can learn more effectively. Moreover, students can help each other while they are working in a group. many students have a weakness in a special area and by working in a group, students can help each other to improve and enhance their knowledge in that area. For instance, a person who has not a great background in math can easily enrich his knowledge in math when function with a student who is expert in math.
The second significant point supporting my idea is that in a group students have time to solve their problem. A team of students are going to share their work and can submit their project before the deadline pass and after that can help other members to solve their problem. But, when a student works alone on a project, it is an arduous task for him because of his lack of time he cannot solve his questions. For example, a student who works alone on a hard project can finish his project near the deadline time and if he tries to solve his problems, he cannot present his project at a deadline time. Hence, he has to skip his problem and only try to finish his project.
To wrap it up, based on the aforementioned arguments, students by working in groups can exchange and improve their knowledge and solve their problem. Consequently, it is highly recommended that the teacher make a restrict role and force students work in groups. In fact, there are myriad of other reasons, challenging the above statement, which could be mentioned but is not embraced due to the dearth of time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | mashghanbar | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
- It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject 76
- TPO 6 Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children 75
- TPO4 3
- TPO 7 Ecocertification for wood companies 76
- For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 417, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
...ther while they are working in a group. many students have a weakness in a special a...
^^^^
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'student'?
Suggestion: student
...t supporting my idea is that in a group students have time to solve their problem. A tea...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 211, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ighly recommended that the teacher make a restrict role and force students work in groups....
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1950.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 407.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79115479115 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59590187452 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46683046683 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 590.4 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8214341155 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.631578947 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4210526316 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319962580085 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11651203858 0.076458572812 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532548831336 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209188713088 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505238727909 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.