The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree?
Capability of learning new languages has become a controversial issue among public all around the world. Although it is regarded by a considerable number of people as thoroughly both constructive and positive, others hold oppenets' view. I am inclined to profoundly believe that it is entirely beneficial as it could develop brilliant aspects for their adherents.
There are several reasons why being familair with another language is advantageous. First and foremost, due to globalization, a plethora of industries and companies will emerge together in future, and working will become hardly. For instance, not only should employees being qualified but also they will force to have sufficient knowledge and information about English in order to communicate with others. Furthermore, different civilization make companies have strong job instructions, and in terms of considering with all labours, it must be published by employers in English. Therefore, if everyone does not the ability to understand English, they will be in trouble.
Moreover, the other essential factor of this ability is a person who knows foriegn languages has more job opportunities than the one who does not this ability. No sooner had people gone abroad to have better life, than thay comprehended that the most significant factor to find an appropriate job is their language. According to the new research which was conducted by Tehran University dewllers who know another language are more successful to find well paid-jobs than others.
In conclusion, while knowing another language has some difficulities and relatively some demerits, I strongly believe that it is vital for prosperous future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-26 | msgnaneswaran | 11 | view |
| 2019-04-06 | mohab.elhaddad | 85 | view |
| 2019-04-02 | foadihasan | 77 | view |
| 2019-04-01 | Fernanda Giorge | 55 | view |
| 2019-02-17 | Mahdi_Farhani | 80 | view |
- Cities are now expanding the government should make a better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership Agree or Disagree 11
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon. 88
- Does television removes our loneliness or not? Discuss 11
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. Cashless society seems to be a reality, and how realistic do you think? What are the advantages and disadvantage es of this phenomenon? 77
- It is important for children to study a film at school to learn literature. To what extent you agree? Give example. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ries and companies will emerge together in future, and working will become hardly. For in...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51937984496 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06664354401 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65503875969 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0882959896 50.4703680194 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 118.666666667 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.25397266985 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218652683035 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715746639069 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482310383906 0.071462118173 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102491006971 0.151781067708 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484193507553 0.0609392437508 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.