Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example.
Nowadays, the style of packaging products has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the world, Which leads to a moot question “whether the government is responsible for over packaging or not?”. It is a widely held view that proper packaging goods is highly beneficial, whereas I tend to believe that one must weigh up the pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, it is a common belief that packaging products by the government plays a vital role in the world of cut-throat competition. To put into consideration, I express several reasons why I support this idea. First and foremost is that the durability of products will be increased as well they are less likely expose to detrimental rays or contamination of the environment. Secondly, it can be argued that an extensive range of people are attracted by amazing packaging and the companies will be able to raise their sells, revenue, and income capacity. In addition to this information, it should be mentioned that a wide variety of companies use this strategy to appeal their potential buyers and introduce the products.
However, over packaging provides people with various negative points. It should be taken into account that inappropriate and extra packaging make the water and natural environment are polluted. Moreover, it is quite clear that the majority of package are more likely flashy and trick in order to tempt customers to purchase the products without to need. A very tangible example to illustrate would be India that people are suffering from over packaging of products.
To recapitulate, I firmly believe that packaging in order to protect goods must be taken into consideration. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-13 | greatrin | 80 | view |
| 2019-07-09 | Sidra018 | 88 | view |
| 2019-03-17 | ajayvermaETP | 80 | view |
| 2019-01-28 | daniel.bakhsheshi@gmail.com | 88 | view |
| 2019-01-19 | lalacamargo1 | 77 | view |
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? Discuss with appropriate examples. 89
- Information revolution has changed the way of mass communication and had some negative effects on individual lives as well on society. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
- The environment we live in is in danger. What are the underlying causes? Who is responsible to combat this? 80
- The space travel is fantastic these days and people are very fascinated towards it but there are many environmental problems in our planet that need to be resolved first. What is your opinion? Should money be spent on space travel or on environmental issu 35
- Some effective people like repetitive routine such as eating the same food do you like this way Discuss your views 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... style of packaging products has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.5418719212 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 301.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20598006645 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97181975804 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1629752635 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.538461538 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161879796617 0.242375264174 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556025788564 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040580136567 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0962397530568 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533284803602 0.0609392437508 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.