The importance of law in human lifehas now become more controversial. It can be agreed that law definitely changes human behaviour towards breaking the law, but it has some drawbacks as well. This essay will elaborate both pros and cons of the impact of law on human behaviour and lead to a logical conclusion.
Firstly, there are numerous ways how law affects human behaviour, one of the most obvious being people stop breaking laws. It is also proving that the crime rate of the city will go down. For instance, a number of laws are introduced regularly on the road to prevent accidents which means people must change their behaviour and thinking to accommodate new laws. These rules are usually also introduced with high penalties. Thus, high penalties and increasing laws are changing human behaviour.
Opposingly some people believe that laws cannot change human behaviour. There are some people who any never affected by any kind of change. An illustration, old age people don’t worry about laws when they drive vehicles. In some cases, people don’t want to change themselves. Another example, there are many laws in India, but no one follows most of them because hard to get penalties.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that law can change human behaviour although it is dependant on human nature.
The importance of law on human behaviour, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial issue. The substantial influence of law has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on human behaviour in recent years. It can be agreed that law can change human behaviour but it has some drawbacks as well. This essay will elaborate both advantages as well as disadvantages of the impact of law on human behaviour and thus will lead to reasoned conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous ways how law can change human behaviour, but the most important one lies in the fact that law makes people behave in certain ways. For example, international studies have shown repeatedly that people drive their vehicles according to the mentioned speed because they fear of getting heavy penalties. Thus, law has dramatic effects on the way human behave.
Nevertheless, there remain some drawbacks, which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of law on human behaviour, but the most alarming one lies in the fact that behaviour and habit cannot be prejudiced by any kind of law as there are some characteristics, which are unchangeable and create hindrance towards obeying some rigorous rules. For instance, an aggressive individual may get aggravated by a particular rule and can continuously contravene, regardless of the penalties he may have to face for it- according to a startling new research from Harvard University. By this way, sometimes law can affect human behaviour adversely.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that law has both positive as well as negative impact on human behaviour.
- Large shopping malls are superseding small shops What is your opinion about this Discuss with appropriate examples 54
- Some people thinks that law changes human behaviour. 55
- whether travel is a necessary component of a quality education. discuss and give your own opinion. 77
- "In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory. Do you agree with the idea of compulsory voting? 82
- Should marketing for consumer goods companies like clothing and food focus on fame and good faith or on short term strategies like discount and special offers And in what ways this can impact on their reputation Why 96
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 379, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...is essay will elaborate both advantages as well as disadvantages of the impact of law on h...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 84, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...be concluded that law has both positive as well as negative impact on human behaviour. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, may, nevertheless, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19402985075 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93296874105 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559701492537 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.8243155839 50.4703680194 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.545454545 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3636363636 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.546714061491 0.242375264174 226% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.246808410892 0.0925447433944 267% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142383237131 0.071462118173 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.347995956721 0.151781067708 229% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155831499329 0.0609392437508 256% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.