Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. Choose which position you most agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading.
Recently, the phenomenon of placing some advertisement in the schools and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that using advertising as a source of income could be beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I profoundly inclined to believe that using commercial promotions in educational facilities could be negative, and this essay will examine both sides of this idea by providing some academic evidence before concluding.
On the one hand, from the financial standpoint, absorbing some extra funds from advertisements could help school’s authorities to manage their financial cash flow. Moreover, using some educational and amusing ads not only could be informative for youngsters but also could lead them to thought out of the box. As a tangible example, while I was a university student and participate in an academic experiment conducted by our university about ads, some commercial billboards were even instructive in terms of healthy lifestyle for young learners.
On the other hand, opponents argued that placing the advertisement in educational institute could bring distraction for juveniles. Furthermore, most of the commercial ads involve some wealthy scene which might lead to pupils obsessed with money. According to an academic research conducted by Tehran Medical University in 2016, most of the young students, pay too much attention to these ads and as a consequence, they might lack behind of their curriculum. Not to mention that, with the lack of sufficient knowledge and education, bright future is not accessible for the young generation.
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that while there are several arguments about using advertisements in public educational institutions as a source of money, I highly tend to believe that detrimental effects of this idea far outweigh its merits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | Maheswari | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | kbalavenka | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | a.aghyi1989 | 88 | view |
| 2019-09-26 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-06-14 | neethujithin | 55 | view |
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 85
- Some people think that young people can learn useful skills by playing electronic and computer games. others argue that people who play electronic and computer games are wasting their time. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- Is individuals' personality affected by nurture and teaching, or genetics is more important? Give your opinion. Support your reasons with examples. 80
- Some people think that people should choose their job based on income in order to provide security for their family Do you think money is an important factor when choosing a job What other factors should be considered 83
- You are applying for a job and need a letter of reference from someone who knew you when you were at school. Write a letter to one of your old teachers asking for a reference. in your letter•Say what job you have applied for.•explain why you want this 34
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s of this idea far outweigh its merits.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55218855219 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1941879164 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599326599327 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.6095538781 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.909090909 104.977214359 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.9669160288 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.25397266985 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157126681395 0.242375264174 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062903230336 0.0925447433944 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391529611305 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0867056642577 0.151781067708 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032397954731 0.0609392437508 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 12.6369458128 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.