The chart shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of air pollutants in 4 cities 2000.
The bar chart illustrates the average daily lowest and highest levels of N20 and S02 in four different cities, namely Los Angeles, Calcutta, Beijing, Mexico City in 2000.
Overall, it can be clearly to seen that Mexico City was by far the most country releasing chemical waste among 4 large cities. However, the other counterpart registered the same level of pollutant emission.
In Los Angeles, the min quantity of S02 emitted was by far the lowest of all the given cities, at 2 micrograms per m3, which was only one-fifth the max quantity one, at 10 micrograms per m3. The max amount of N02 emission nearly tripled the min amount, at 39 and 104 micrograms per m3 respectively. Strikingly, the max emission of N20 and S02 registered the highest figure with 113 and 207 respectively. Also, Mexico City contaminated this city by N20 was significant more than S02 by approximately 33 micrograms per m3.
By contrast, in Calcutta and Beijing the emission of S20 was consistently higher than that of N02. Specifically, the max amount of S02 in Calcutta and Beijing was 59 and 100 micrograms per m3 compared to 52 and 54 micrograms per m3 for that of N02. The min emission of S02 recorded 47 micrograms per m3, which was double that of in Beijing during the given period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-25 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 67 | view |
| 2018-02-25 | Baonhi | 67 | view |
| 2018-02-25 | Baonhi | 61 | view |
- The given bar charts indicate the proportion of money that people in France, Germany and England spent on food and other products in 1998 and 2008. 61
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 73
- The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled PMT by transportation type in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 84
- the charts below changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003 84
- the bar graph below shows the numbers of male and female research students studying 6 subjects at an US university in 2011 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of in Beijing during the given period.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79185520362 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80965234709 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506787330317 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5828175577 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.9 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.1 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0939566387806 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487248453242 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785544360734 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094883698277 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0982277469045 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.