Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this. Discuss with appropriate examples.
The importance of shopping preference, which was debatable has now become controversial. Substantial influence of shopping complex’s have sparked controversy over the potential impact of this trend on shopping habits in recent years. It can be said, large shopping malls can solve various issue, however, some people concern that large shopping complex are replacing small shops. This essay will elaborate why shopping complex’s replacing small shops is a positive move and why large shopping malls replacing small shops should be considered and thus, will lead to logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why shopping malls are more popular among urban communities, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that, shopping complex is a one stop access to myriad shops. Example for instance, facilities such as, ample parking, cloths, confectioneries, food court, children play area, are provided under one roof. Moreover, large shopping malls reduce traffic congestion on the roads. Large shopping complex can play a vital role in improving traffic conditions and hassle free shopping.
Nevertheless, some people adopt opposing views and tend to believe that large shopping malls replacing small shops are significant as there are innumerable reasons for that, but the most predominant one lies in that fact that, small shops have limited products. Example as an illustration, small shops have limited supplies and are usually placed inside suburbs and result into congested roads and localities. Thus, small shops replayed by large shopping complex is favourable for suburban localities.
For what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that large shopping mall replacing small shops is prominent, but impact of small shops should not be overlooked.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-07 | ashish khanal | 77 | view |
| 2018-11-26 | ashish khanal | 77 | view |
- Illiterate of future would not be one who does not know to read, but people who do not know how to learn. 76
- In A War Of Ideas, It Is People Who Get Killed”. Does A Common Man Suffer From A Group’s Ideology? 77
- Any recent invention that you think proved beneficial or detrimental to society. 77
- Should jobs be reserved for woman, do your agree or disagree? 80
- Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s act. What is your opinion? Support it with personal example. 55
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 31.9359605911 66% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59489051095 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79061557682 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558394160584 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8018526654 50.4703680194 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.75 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343470564932 0.242375264174 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148703652657 0.0925447433944 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950048006409 0.071462118173 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245218982835 0.151781067708 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716143932108 0.0609392437508 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.