Poverty is a major issue world wide. Many charities exist to help collect monetary donations. Who should decide what the donations are spent on? The people in need or the charitable organizations?
Since the beginning of the 21st century, phenomenon of the poverty has spread widely throughout the world, and the need for charities existence has increased significantly. Some people believe that people should have the choice to select where the collected money should be spent, while others argue that charitable organizations should have the right of selection on this money. This essay will discuss the reasons why the people in need must choose where the donations should be spent.
People in need have the legal right to choose where the donation monies should be spent because they have known the required services. The needs of people differ, which could be as a medical services or a financial services. Recent research, which was conducted in the Cambridge University, has shown that 90% of monetary donations are not used in a suitable manner when they are given to charitable organizations. Therefore, it seems clear that monetary donations should be expended based on the people needs.
On the other hand, some people think that charitable organizations own the legal right on spending the monetary donations. They believe that these organizations have known the requirements of people and people may use these donations improper ways. But these people are unaware of the fact that these organizations are spending a large amount of donations on unnecessary activities that do not help people. Thus, poor people should select how to spend their financial donations without intervene charitable organizations.
In conclusion, this essay discussed why people own the right to choose where the monetary donations should be spent without the intervention of any charitable organizations. In my opinion, I am inclined to believe that people know there needs and it is better they select their requirements.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-08 | meenutalwar | 75 | view |
| 2018-04-08 | meenutalwar | 75 | view |
| 2018-04-07 | TravelM | 85 | view |
| 2018-04-07 | TravelM | 55 | view |
| 2018-04-04 | manish123 | 80 | view |
- In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed”. Does a common man suffer from a group’s ideology? Express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and examples. 55
- Many people think regions affect successful persons. What is your opinion about native regions and accomplished person influence on the regions they belong to? 70
- Road rules are generally enforced by fining people for infringements. Some people, however, believe that governments should not penalize unsafe drivers but reward safe drivers instead.Which view do you support? 72
- some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. 55
- Some people think law changes human behavior. Do you agree or disagree? 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 216, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'service'?
Suggestion: service
...be as a medical services or a financial services. Recent research, which was conducted i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 346, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a suitable manner" with adverb for "suitable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... 90% of monetary donations are not used in a suitable manner when they are given to charitable organ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 6.10837438424 246% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 5.94088669951 269% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34375 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84184578764 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486111111111 0.580463131201 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 473.4 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7698097554 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.384615385 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348480226977 0.242375264174 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134784124922 0.0925447433944 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418934469491 0.071462118173 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223015795143 0.151781067708 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522780451501 0.0609392437508 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.32886699507 94% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.