Poverty is a major issue worldwide. Many charities exist to help collect monetary donations. Who should decide what the donations are spent on? The people in need or the charitable organisations? Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading.
Nowadays, one of the major unsolved world wide probles is poverty, swhich should be held by specialized organisations. Many people think charity organisation they could on their own solve what is the most needed for people, while other believe that poor ones should decide on their own. This esay will discuss both sides of the argument, and show that most of the money is wasted ineffective way.
Those who argue for charity organisations believe that as a possessional company they know demands and expectation of people in need. This is only partialy true, because they are not aware of all local and political circumstances. For example, in Bolivia many people suffer a lack of rice and pure water. This is why many charity organisations send there many goods, but after a few years occured that the number of rice per person is the highest among all American countries. Therefore, the distribution of the goods and money should be more coordnated by such organisations.
On the other hand, many people with low income just need some money to survie. Giving the possibility to decide about yourself future is curcial to help such people. To illustrate, scientist at the Ohio University discovered that monthly low income incrases chances for normal live by 30%. Charity organisations should give that opporunity people to decide themselves.
This essay discussed how charity organisations can interfere on poverty rates by smiple changes in the distribution of the money. In my opinion, there are many ways to help people in need but most efficeint would be just to give them money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-08 | meenutalwar | 75 | view |
| 2018-04-08 | meenutalwar | 75 | view |
| 2018-04-07 | TravelM | 85 | view |
| 2018-04-07 | TravelM | 55 | view |
| 2018-04-04 | manish123 | 80 | view |
- Human employment is continuously decreasing as a result of artificially intelligentrobots. While some people think that human labour will eventually become completely obsolete,others maintain that robots will never be able to perform certain jobs. 55
- It is becoming increasingly popular to have a year off between finishing school. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? 75
- In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed. Does a common man suffer from a group ideology? Express your opinion and support with reasons and example. 55
- The importance of cars and airplanes in modern life. Give examples. 72
- Poverty is a major issue worldwide. Many charities exist to help collect monetary donations. Who should decide what the donations are spent on? The people in need or the charitable organisations? Support your point of view with details from your own exper 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
Nowadays, one of the major unsolved world wide probles is poverty, swhich should be he...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
Nowadays, one of the major unsolved world wide probles is poverty, swhich should be he...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, therefore, while, for example, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06844106464 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76167629557 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593155893536 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.688519048 50.4703680194 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.2142857143 104.977214359 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 7.25397266985 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22673310355 0.242375264174 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782881841286 0.0925447433944 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630201159581 0.071462118173 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139974380755 0.151781067708 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.014452364065 0.0609392437508 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.