Some people believe that history has little to tell us. Other people believe that people must have knowledge of history in order to understand the present.
People have different views about how history plays an significant role in our life. While history has not enough information to us to some extent, I would argue that this subject is prominence in current day.
On the one hand, it is sometimes argued that studying history can be a wasteful activity. Firstly, knowledge of history can not apply to the present-day demands as science, technology and social systems in the past were out-of-date. For example, people often sent a letter to other in the past which took a long time, while, with the development of technology people can use electronic devices to keep in touch. If people put these trends to the present, the life-style might not develop gradually. Secondly, each historical event has different perpectives. For this reason, it makes learning history a waste of time because events can also be interpreted in a different way which makes what people learn in history less valuable.
On the other hand, history is a foundation in the present. Firstly, history teaches people what their forefathers experienced and suffered in the past in order to make their country what it is today. Therefore, people will continue to develop their nations like their acestors did. Next, history teaches us about travesties which have occurred in the past, such as the Holocaust. It is essential for both people in the past, present and future to never forget such events in order to honour the memory of those lost and to ensure it never happens again.
Inconclusion, it can not deny that learning history is not practical in the present, however it is a main basis to underpin a country.
- The graphs below show the annual expenditure of university students in three countries in 2003 77
- The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home to work, shopping and education.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 73
- The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000 It also predicts figures for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 62
- The table shows the average annual percentages of water pollution in four large cities in 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...different views about how history plays an significant role in our life. While his...
^^
Line 3, column 657, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... because events can also be interpreted in a different way which makes what people learn in histor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94927536232 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66318889478 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550724637681 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3833669539 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5714285714 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353541655267 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122289888035 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519354005939 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204478482434 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674281383924 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.