The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007.
Given is a line chart illustrating the percentage of British family which owned different number of vehicles in Great Britain for a period of 35 years from 1971 to 2007.
Overall, the percentage of households that occupied only one car was considerably higher than all other situations during the period given whereas that was the least for families who used more than two cars at the same time. Meanwhile, the proportion of people who did not have any car dramatically fell.
In 2007, the percentage of English who owned one car claimed the greatest among all situations at around 45 percent, which was almost double that of people who occupied two cars ranked at the second (about 25 percent). However, It could be seen that the latter was only at just under 10 percent 35 years ago whereas the former was already around five times than that (nearly 45 percent).
Besides, the percentage of British who had no car dramatically decreased and reached a low in 2006 at approximately 25 percent, the figure was a half lower compared to that (just under 50 percent) in 1971, while that of households who owned more than two cars slightly went up to just over five percent in 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | ali1902 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | ali1902 | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | dglore | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-02 | Nguyễn Đỗ Phước | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-02 | Nguyễn Đỗ Phước | 73 | view |
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 73
- There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays? 56
- The three pie charts below shows the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows Long-Term International Migration in UK, 1999-2008.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- Every country has poor people and every country has different ways of dealing with the poor.What are some of the reasons for world poverty? How can the poor be helped? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, second, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 3.15609756098 475% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73300970874 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51713423299 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54854368932 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.8126461005 43.030603864 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.5 112.824112599 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.3333333333 22.9334400587 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13547386385 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765301481057 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491375614094 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0961028220208 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350278823407 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.2329268293 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.89 61.2550243902 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.75 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.