Effective decision making is one of the most crucial aspect for any company's future positive growth prospects. Many companies have innovative decision making policies that includes the underlying inputs from their respective employees. Such policies eventually helps in effective and commendable progression of the company in the direction of most profitable growing opportunities.
Since, employees viewpoints are taken into consideration for crucial decisions, they feel more valued which will imminently raise their level of efforts and commitments to ensure that their decisive points actually turns into a success. As a result, this will indirectly benefit the company's growth as their employees are more aligned towards the goals of company then before. Moreover, associates can indisputably make better day-to-day decisions as they possess more accurate and detailed information regarding the direction of the company or department, since they are the ones who are actually working at the heart of the problems that their organization is facing.
In addition to this, involvement of employees in the such complicated decision process, can eventually speed up the arrival of positive outcome with the most sustainable reasoning. As, when many people solves the same problem, everyone will have their different angles to the same situation, causing the best result to surface rapidly. Also, it frees up time for upper management to look at other inevitable problems and innovative solutions which can help in increasing the business of the company. For example, manager will now have time to look at how department's or company's customers are changing their demands and level of expectations. This will help organization to build innovative solutions that will sustain their survival in the competitive market.
Hence, it can be concluded that employees involvement in decision making policies is fruitful for the sustainable progression and imminent future growth of the company.
- Some people believe laws change human behavior. Do you agree with it? 77
- Age discrimination occurs when a decision is made on the basis of a person s age In the workplace these are most often decisions about being employed in the first place winning promotions or being unfairly dismissed Should discrimination against older wor 94
- Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of product producers to avoid extra packaging of products 89
- In education system assessment through written formal examinations is valid or not OR Do you think that formal written examinations are a good way to assess knowledge at school 93
- The use of newspaper will be less important in future. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Explain with reasons and examples. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'conclude'
Suggestion: conclude
...he competitive market. Hence, it can concluded that employees involvement in decision ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 30, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...market. Hence, it can concluded that employees involvement in decision making policies...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, hence, if, look, moreover, regarding, so, then, for example, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68791946309 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92901507652 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543624161074 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 532.8 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1006625594 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.25 104.977214359 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 7.25397266985 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199569960918 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827560921164 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479935908471 0.071462118173 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142148907925 0.151781067708 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378288520394 0.0609392437508 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.