In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. But this effort has failed: the number of accidents has not decreased, and, based on reports by the highway patrol, many drivers are exceeding the speed limit. Prunty County should instead undertake the same kind of road improvement project that Butler County completed five years ago: increasing lane widths, resurfacing rough highways, and improving visibility at dangerous intersections. Today, major Butler County roads still have a 55 mph speed limit, yet there were 25 percent fewer reported accidents in Butler County this past year than there were five years ago.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
According to the statement that in an attempt to improve highway safety, prunty county should undertake the same kind of road improvement project that butler county completed five years ago. The statement asserted that the attempt of reducing speed limit is not only sufficient to control the accident in the punty county. On support the argument, the statement compare the last year lowered accident in the butler county as its effort on increasing lane widths, resurfacing rough highways, and improving visibility at dangerous intersections. even on speed limit of a 55 mph, there is lower accident case in the butler county. however, the argument failed to give these three evidences to prove the statement right.
Firstly, the argument failed to consider that what is the vechile density of that county and what is the vechile density of the prunty county. perhaps, this may be feasible plan for the bultler county as they may have lower vechile density and it is sufficient to reduce the infall accident only on giving priority on the increasing lane widths, resurfacing rough highways, and improving visibility at dangerous intersections. The same results may not be occur in the punty county as they have densly populated road and busy traffic. Thus, the premises that argument has provided if taken this information or evidence that may be plausible otherwise it remains chaotic plan in the favor of punty country.
Secondly, the argument only takes a one year data to prove that the increasing lane widths, resurfacing rough highways, and improving visibility at dangerous intersections w2ill be sufficient enough to decrease accident rate. perhaps, it may not be true for upcoming year. it is posssible that the few car only have greater speed in the buler county and it results less accident in one year data. may later that year people will feel safe even in high speed and more drive in higher speed and may results greater accident in coming year. if it will be true it surely negates the puposed argument.
Thirdly, the argument cannot provide the evidence that the capital require for increasing lane widths, resurfacing rough highways, and improving visibility at dangerous intersections is sufficient the punty county. perhaps butler county have well resource and the budget for this kind of the project will not be great deal for them. however, similar scenario will not be feasible for the punty county as it may not able to fund such heavy amount on the project. perhaps punty county doesnot have well resorce and they are strugling finanacially and the given solution will be exorbitant price to meet it. if the argument has provided the evidence regarding such case, it will be warranted but it fails to hold the account.
In conclusion, the argument of prunty county should undertake the same kind of road improvement project that butler county completed five years ago is insubstantial as it doesnot provide the above mention evidence. To become warranted the argument must raise their horizon of the foundation where their whole argument based.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | sapana | 33 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | yswang | 34 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | angeshpokharel | 55 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | bishal sitaula | 53 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | smithsonite79 | 63 | view |
- In future students may have the choice of studying at home by using technology such as computers or television or of studying traditional schools Which would you prefer Use reasons and specific details to explain your choice 76
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to 70
- summarize the points made in the lecture ,being sure to explain how they cast a doubt on the specific theories in the reading passage.Altruism 3
- The Little Ice Age 75
- "The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies 50
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 12 15
No. of Words: 504 350
No. of Characters: 2521 1500
No. of Different Words: 195 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.738 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.002 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.551 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 191 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 144 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 95 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 54 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 42 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 24.348 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.833 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.426 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.68 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.151 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 545, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Even
... visibility at dangerous intersections. even on speed limit of a 55 mph, there is lo...
^^^^
Line 1, column 629, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...wer accident case in the butler county. however, the argument failed to give these thre...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Perhaps
...e vechile density of the prunty county. perhaps, this may be feasible plan for the bult...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... accident only on giving priority on the increasing lane widths, resurfacing roug...
^^^
Line 5, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... takes a one year data to prove that the increasing lane widths, resurfacing roug...
^^
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Perhaps
...cient enough to decrease accident rate. perhaps, it may not be true for upcoming year. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
..., it may not be true for upcoming year. it is posssible that the few car only have...
^^
Line 5, column 383, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r county and it results less accident in one year data. may later that year peopl...
^^
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: May
...esults less accident in one year data. may later that year people will feel safe e...
^^^
Line 5, column 541, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...esults greater accident in coming year. if it will be true it surely negates the p...
^^
Line 5, column 541, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...esults greater accident in coming year. if it will be true it surely negates the p...
^^
Line 5, column 589, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll be true it surely negates the puposed argument. Thirdly, the argument cannot...
^^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Perhaps
...ections is sufficient the punty county. perhaps butler county have well resource and th...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 334, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...roject will not be great deal for them. however, similar scenario will not be feasible ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 449, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ay not able to fund such heavy amount on the project. perhaps punty county doesno...
^^
Line 7, column 464, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Perhaps
...fund such heavy amount on the project. perhaps punty county doesnot have well resorce ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ation where their whole argument based.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, well, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.6327345309 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.9520958084 139% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 11.1786427146 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 28.8173652695 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 55.5748502994 85% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 16.3942115768 152% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2575.0 2260.96107784 114% => OK
No of words: 504.0 441.139720559 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10912698413 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73813722054 4.56307096286 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61229212327 2.78398813304 94% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 204.123752495 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.402777777778 0.468620217663 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 808.2 705.55239521 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1876220436 57.8364921388 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.619047619 119.503703932 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 23.324526521 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.80952380952 5.70786347227 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 17.0 5.25449101796 324% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 6.88822355289 203% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228867381917 0.218282227539 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780252838068 0.0743258471296 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703346350495 0.0701772020484 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144118372253 0.128457276422 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0900127295982 0.0628817314937 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.3799401198 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.3550499002 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.197005988 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.5979740519 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.32208582834 94% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 98.500998004 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.