The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants.
"Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had little impact on our customers. In fact, only about 2 percent of customers have complained, indicating that an average of 98 people out of 100 are happy with the change. Furthermore, many servers have reported that a number of customers who ask for butter do not complain when they are given margarine instead. Clearly, either these customers do not distinguish butter from margarine or they use the term 'butter' to refer to either butter or margarine."
Write a response in which you discuss one or more alternative explanations that could rival the proposed explanation and explain how your explanation(s) can plausibly account for the facts presented in the argument.
The author claims that replacing butter by margarine, does not effect the customers' views about their food. The argument fails to mention several key factors, on the basis of which it could be evaluted and he also tries to manipulate facts by providing week examples. He also give some numeric data as well as server information. However, careful scrutiny of the evidence reavels that it provides little credible support to author's claim. Hence, the argument can be considered incomplete or unsubstantiated.
First of all, the argument readily assume that survey they conduct, can also imply on other people. To justify this claim he gives explination with some numeric data. This is merely assumptions made without solid ground. For example, he has not provided sufficient data on which this survey conducts and leaves us with some questions, like, how many people's review they consider? how they have not baised towerds margarine? So, we can say that author must provide proof on which bases he asserts that only 2 percent customers have complained about this.
The argument readily rely on servers' claim about customers who ask for butter do not complain when they are given margaraine instead. He has not given any perticuler server's name. He has also not given numeric data which give answer to question that how many customers have not problem with margaraine instead of butter. Author just try to manipulate public's view regarding butter. If argument have provided sufficient data, it can assert that his both claims are true. Nevertheless, he has not provide sufficient data, we can say that he just try to allege his statement about customers
Finally, in his last statement he has not given information about whom he is talking about. He has not clear which customers can not distinguish between butter and margarine. However, one can clearly know different taste of food which is made with margarine instead of butter. So,it is not fruitful for their restaurants' reputations. Because of one minor mistake, it can cost huge amount to him and his restaurants.
In the conclusion, I just want to say that this kind of greediness of manager can lead to huge lost to his restaurants. Manager should concentrate to his restaurant's reputation. Manager should give some potential evidence to make his assertion strong. He also give information regarding numeric data that how they have calculated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-20 | Krishna Prasad | 46 | view |
| 2019-09-10 | orlando23 | 59 | view |
| 2019-07-30 | Amin Beheshti | 72 | view |
| 2019-03-09 | adhgna@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2018-11-24 | julls.kl | 72 | view |
- The following appeared in an editorial in a local newspaper."Commuters complain that increased rush-hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time. The favored proposal of the motorists' lobby is to w 50
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 66
- To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to addre 50
- The following recommendation was made by the president and administrative staff of Grove College, a private institution, to the college's governing committee."We recommend that Grove College preserve its century-old tradition of all-female education rathe 50
- Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...replacing butter by margarine, does not effect the customers views about their food. T...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'gives'.
Suggestion: gives
...cts by providing week examples. He also give some numeric data as well as server in...
^^^^
Line 1, column 310, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e also give some numeric data as well as server information. However, careful scr...
^^
Line 2, column 380, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: How
... how many peoples review they consider? how they have not baised towerds margarine?...
^^^
Line 2, column 443, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d towerds margarine? So, we can say that author must provide proof on which bases...
^^
Line 2, column 526, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he asserts that only 2 percent customers have complained about this. The argum...
^^
Line 4, column 496, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'provided'.
Suggestion: provided
...aims are true. Nevertheless, he has not provide sufficient data, we can say that he jus...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 280, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...ade with margarine instead of butter. So,it is not fruitful for their restaurants r...
^^^
Line 7, column 260, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'gives'.
Suggestion: gives
...e to make his assertion strong. He also give information regarding numeric data that...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'nevertheless', 'regarding', 'so', 'well', 'for example', 'kind of', 'talking about', 'as well as', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.20823798627 0.25644967241 81% => OK
Verbs: 0.189931350114 0.15541462614 122% => OK
Adjectives: 0.070938215103 0.0836205057962 85% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0892448512586 0.0520304965353 172% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0846681922197 0.0272364105082 311% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.102974828375 0.125424944231 82% => OK
Participles: 0.0434782608696 0.0416121511921 104% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.67355809798 2.79052419416 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0297482837529 0.026700313972 111% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.045766590389 0.113004496875 40% => Some determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0297482837529 0.0255425247493 116% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0320366132723 0.0127820249294 251% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2412.0 2731.13054187 88% => OK
No of words: 393.0 446.07635468 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.13740458015 6.12365571057 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.57801047555 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.361323155216 0.378187486979 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.29262086514 0.287650121315 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.193384223919 0.208842608468 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.129770992366 0.135150697306 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67355809798 2.79052419416 96% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 207.018472906 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508905852417 0.469332199767 108% => OK
Word variations: 55.7638013813 52.1807786196 107% => OK
How many sentences: 25.0 20.039408867 125% => OK
Sentence length: 15.72 23.2022227129 68% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1492114141 57.7814097925 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.48 141.986410481 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.72 23.2022227129 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.64 0.724660767414 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 3.58251231527 251% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 44.982086514 51.9672348444 87% => OK
Elegance: 0.974842767296 1.8405768891 53% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169670835066 0.441005458295 38% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.125300642929 0.135418324435 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0943786082334 0.0829849096947 114% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.4468796701 0.58762219726 76% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.124273852664 0.147661913831 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607695527323 0.193483328276 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435515089278 0.0970749176394 45% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.279290326239 0.42659136922 65% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0814577722377 0.0774707102158 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117446141578 0.312017818177 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416015614365 0.0698173142475 60% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.33743842365 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.87684729064 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.82512315271 187% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 7.0 6.46551724138 108% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 5.36822660099 149% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.82389162562 106% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 14.657635468 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.