The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition."
-
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
There are various definitions of a leader. According to me, a leader is the crucial member of a group who leads, guide, delegates the tasks, and helps everyone to achieve a common goal.
Initially, in order to prepare young people for leadership by instilling cooperation rather than competition seems appealing in any field. To achieve the goal of a group, leader must strive towards it with cooperation. Cooperation will lead to better unity amongst that group by helping one another in their tasks, resulting the work to flow in harmony. If a group lacks cooperation there will be chaos and team might fail to complete tasks in time resulting failure of goals. So, leaders must make sure that there's cooperation in the group.
On the other hand there must be certain degree of competition which will lead to betterment of individual goals along with improvement of whole products/service line which is offered to the consumers of the society.
We can take the example of leading brand for decades - Nokia; they always worked with cooperation and succesfully achieved better quality of phones having a good product. But, Nokia's competitors were manufacturing somewhat inferior product with different software. People preferred the products of other manufacturer compared to Noika which led to fall of Nokia. This fall was because of lacking competition.
In conclusion, cooperation might not be the only thing that must be instilled in a leader rather a fusion of both cooperation and competion is essential for achieving the goals of a group to sustain in this world.
- Claim: An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action.Reason: When assessing the morality of an action, the results of an action are more important than the in 33
- Some people marry shortly after finishing college. Others prefer to focus on their carriers first and wait until later to get married. Which of these situations do you think is better? 60
- SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville. The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville proves that Corporateville is a superior place to live than Middlesburg, the home of SuperCorp's original headquarters. Moreov 63
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a local newspaper in Masontown:“If we want to save money on municipal garbage disposal fees, we need to encourage our residents to recycle more. Late last year, our neighboring town, Hayesworth, passed 55
- Claim: An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action.Reason: When assessing the morality of an action, the results of the action are more important than the i 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 44, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...re are various definitions of a leader. According to me, a leader is the crucial member of a gr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 510, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
... goals. So, leaders must make sure that theres cooperation in the group. On the ...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d succesfully achieved better quality of phones having a good product. But, Nokia...
^^
Line 13, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t, Nokias competitors were manufacturing somewhat inferior product with different...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 33.0505617978 30% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 2235.4752809 60% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 257.0 442.535393258 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18677042802 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88514020671 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607003891051 0.4932671777 123% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 704.065955056 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.7812216779 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.538461538 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7692307692 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119240196775 0.243740707755 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04403671944 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598029786891 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0623062498071 0.150359130593 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340381825059 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.