In business, education, and government, it is always appropriate to remain skeptical of new leaders until those leaders show that they are worthy of trust.
The statement says that skepticism benefit the leaders in many fields since they need to work hard as to prove themselves as trustworthy. However, in my point of view, neither more nor less skepticism seems better in most of the situations.
Skepticism unquestionably acts as a central role to make sure a leader's quality. In a democratic society, election acts as a tool for the public to express agreement or skepticism toward the leaders. It can prevent the happening of malpractice or corruption. It also encourages improvement because the leader needs to keep pursuit the general welfare if he or she wants to win the next election. For instance, the Water gate scandal increases the scrutiny and accountability to which our public officials are held. President Nixon was forced to resign and left the office thereafter. This history addresses the indispensability of skepticism.
Furthermore, it is vital for people to question the justice and appropriation of current regulation and laws under this ever-changing world. Recently, Argentina's government just makes abortion legal. It was a shock and a breakthrough to the long-lasting tradition in the Catholic world. In fact, because the leaders have notice how many woman have suffered from the infection and death caused by illegal abortion, they make a big progress on woman's right by placing skepticism on the previous tradition.
On the other hand, undue skepticism is likely to bring negative impact. For example, teachers will lose motivation and energy in teaching if his or her students keep being doubtful about the lessons. Leaders of the government will feel frustrated if the public is unwilling to abide by his or her policy. Likewise, bosses will not be able to manage the company efficiently if the employees keep questioning his or her decisions. Admittedly, skepticism does benefit the leaders most of the time; its drawback may outweigh its benefit if not managed properly.
In the final analysis, remaining skeptical with a leader is positive and to be praised as far as it is done wisely. Namely, if people always suspect incapacity in their leaders with a certain degree of hostility, they automatically prevent their leaders from expressing themselves.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-13 | guozhishan | 54 | view |
| 2023-10-13 | graceeehgq | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | rickxiangx | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | rickxiangx | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | rickxiangx | 50 | view |
- According to an independent poll of 200 charitable organizations overall donations of money to nonprofit groups increased last year but educational institutions did not fare as well as other organizations Donations to international aid groups increased th 57
- The effectiveness of a country s leaders is best measured by examining the well being of that country s citizens 83
- Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country 66
- Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station s coverage of weather a 71
- The data from a survey of high school math and science teachers show that in the district of Sanlee many of these teachers reported assigning daily homework whereas in the district of Marlee most science and math teachers reported assigning homework no mo 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 425, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'big progress'.
Suggestion: big progress
...h caused by illegal abortion, they make a big progress on womans right by placing skepticism o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, likewise, may, so, as for, as to, for example, for instance, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1887.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 359.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25626740947 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02392802807 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596100278552 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0325505188 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.35 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.95 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237673631001 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591007319939 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059080021973 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128716080272 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519287248277 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.