Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Imagine a world with no restrictions. Though, initially this leeway could make people feel truely free. But it could soon create a world where robbery, espionage and other such felony could become quotidian. With the judicial system and the laws in place, the human civilization has become safer. These laws, laid out by a particular nation or any other judicial organisation, are expected to be followed by the denizens of the corresponding regions with the duress of facing punitive actions. The prompt suggests that this responsibility of obeying these just laws and to disobey and resist the unjust ones lies with each denizen. I mostly agree with this prompt for the following reasons.
To begin with, by having a sense of probity and obeying the laws has a two-pronged advantage. Constantly, behaving within the laws set out and assigning a moral obligation to not disobey laws, would set an example for others who could digress from the ideal path. This would efficaciously reduce the crime rates of that particular region and make for a more conducive and safe society. Also, having this attitude of obeying laws and the justification for the same right from home itself would mould the children since, children become what they see. This would not just tremendously reduce the possibility of juvenile delinquency and make them more tolerant but also stem the future adult criminals.
However, there could be certain unjust laws, that could stir up indignation amongst the ones who suffer from the injustice caused by such laws. Resisting such supposedly unjust laws and using the appropriate designated mediums for raising concerns of the injustice caused by these laws could create a holistic society. Nevertheless, assuming that a law is unjust and directly disobeying such unjust laws could account for felony. This perception of whether the law is just or not could differ from person to person and hence, disobeying would not be remedy to tackling unjust laws. Rather, using the facilities provided to raise concern about the justness of a law would go a long way in not just having an increased trust in the judicial system but also constantly morally judging every action that a person would take.
With reference to the above reasons mentioned, the laws set out by a judicial system ought to be obeyed by every individual. However, any law that seems unjust must be brought into light.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Abhipray Singh | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | Jolly1111111 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | chapagain08 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | Bonjourkmm | 58 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 75
- Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Imagine a world with no restrictions. Though, initially this leeway could make peopl...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, to begin with, with reference to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2016.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 398.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06532663317 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61405083851 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510050251256 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3828005653 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.105263158 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9473684211 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26315789474 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199735367413 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715983275312 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559060622348 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133055017801 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355282909958 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.